Plenary Sessions
Monday, 20 May - Friday, 24 May
Last updated 20 February 2009
|
Monday,
20 May
08:20 |
Lauterbur Lecture: MRI -
From Beginnings to Maybe
Each year the ISMRM Scientific Meeting opens with the Lauterbur Lecture to recognize Paul
Lauterbur and his many contributions to our field. In honor of the 10th Scientific
Meeting of the ISMRM, this year Dr. Lauterbur will provide his recollections of the
beginnings of MRI and his perspective of its future.
|
Paul C. Lauterbur, University of
Illinois, Urbana, Il, USA |
|
High Field In Vivo
Magnetic Resonance
Monday, 20 May
Zahi A. Fayad, John R. Griffiths, Peter Jezzard, Michael E. Moseley, and Douglas C. Noll,
Organizers |
Educational Objectives:
Upon completion of this session, participants should be able to:
Define the rationale for performing human magnetic resonance studies at high magnetic
field strength;
Identify the technological challenges that have had to be
met and will have to be met in order to successfully employ high magnetic field
techniques;
Describe the specific advantages of performing imaging and
spectroscopic experiments in human subjects at high magnetic fields;
List several cutting-edge imaging and spectroscopic
applications that have been used successfully at high field to study normal healthy human
subjects and disease populations;
Appraise the future potential of high magnetic field MR
imaging and spectroscopy. |
|
09:00 |
Technological Challenges and
Solutions for High Field In Vivo Magnetic Resonance |
J. Thomas Vaughan, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA |
09:25 |
High Field Human Imaging |
David G. Norris, F.C. Donders
Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, The Netherlands |
09:50 |
Clinical and Physiological Studies
with High Field Human Spectroscopy and Spectroscopic Imaging |
Jullie W. Pan, Albert Einstein
College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA |
|
Microcirculation and
Atherosclerosis
Tuesday, 21 May
Zahi A. Fayad, Garry E. Gold, Michael E. Moseley, and Pottumarthi V. Prasad, Organizers |
Educational Objectives:
Upon completion of this session, participants should be able to:
Explain and apply MR protocols for determination of atherosclerotic disease;
Describe methodology and interpret results for
atherosclerotic disease assessment;
Explain why embolization and perfusion are important in the
context of stroke and myocardial disease. |
|
08:15 |
Recognition of the Importance of
Embolization in Atherosclerotic and Vascular Disease |
Christopher Bajzer, Cleveland
Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA |
08:40 |
MR Myocardial Perfusion in
Atherosclerotic Coronary Artery Disease |
Norbert M. Wilke, University of
Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA |
09:05 |
Neuroimaging of Stroke
Atherosclerosis |
Michael Hennerici, University of
Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany |
|
MR
Microscopy
Wednesday, 22 May
Mathias Hoehn, Michael Neeman, and Pottumarthi V. Prasad, Organizers |
Educational Objectives:
Upon completion of this session, participants should be able to:
Compare the performance of NMR microscopy relative to alternative microscopy modalities,
particularly multi-photon optical imaging;
Define the limits of resolution in NMR microscopy;
Recognize potential applications for NMR microscopy;
Appraise the contribution of NMR to developmental biology. |
|
08:15 |
The Resolution Challenge of Optical
Imaging: Multiphoton Optics |
Winfried Denk, Max-Planck
Institute, Heidelberg, Germany |
08:40 |
Dynamic MR Microscopy in
Developmental Biology |
Russell E. Jacobs, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA |
09:05 |
Structural and Morphological MR
Microscopy: Limits and Potential |
G. Alan Johnson, Duke University,
Durham, NC, USA |
|
Ethics
in Research
Thursday, 23 May
Jörg E. Debatin, Jeffrey L. Evelhoch, David J. Lomas, Riccardo Manfredi, Mark Schweitzer,
and Scott E. Swanson, Organizers |
Educational Objectives:
Upon completion of this session, participants should be able to:
Articulate the principles guiding ethical practices in research;
Describe common questionable research practices and their
negative impact on the research process;
Explain how conflicts of interest occur and how they may
affect the integrity of the research;
Identify situations that encourage or prevent research
misconduct;
Describe how human subjects are best protected in research
studies. |
|
08:15 |
Integrity in Research: Advice from
the Office of Research Integrity |
Alan R. Price, US Department of
Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA |
08:40 |
Ethics in the Publication of
Research |
Lee F. Rogers, Wake Forest
University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA |
09:05 |
Ethics and Intellectual Property |
Judy M. Johncox, Indiana
University, Indianapolis, IN, USA |
|
|
Image Reconstruction
Friday, 24 May
Peter Boesiger, Kim Butts, Douglas C. Noll, and Daniel K. Sodickson, Organizers |
Educational Objectives:
Upon completion of this session, participants should be able to:
Compare the history and evolution of reconstruction approaches for carious medical imaging
modalities (CT, MR, nuclear imaging, ultrasound, etc.) and identify connections and
commonalties among approaches;
Define current areas of interest and active research in MR
image reconstruction; evaluate recent progress in areas such as (1) data regridding and
rapid image formation from non-Cartesian acquisitions, (2) non-Fourier imaging approaches,
(3) reconstruction of undersampled k-space trajectories and (4) parallel imaging;
Define current areas of interest and active research in MR
spectroscopic signal processing and spectroscopic image reconstruction; evaluate recent
progress in areas such as (1) data regridding for spectroscopic images and signals, (2)
reduction of lipid artifacts, (3) spectral fitting and metabolite quantification and (4)
parallel acquisition and reconstruction strategies;
Compare and contrast particular reconstruction needs and challenges for imaging and
spectroscopy;
Identify enabling hardware for modern image reconstruction
and spectroscopic signal processing; predict future trends in computer hardware, digital
signal processor chips, analog-to-digital converters, etc. which may further facilitate
the rapid and efficient handling of MR signal data. |
|
08:15 |
The Computer Image: A Comparative
Historical Perspective on Medical Image Reconstruction Across Modalities |
Gary H. Glover, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA, USA |
08:40 |
Current Issues in MR Image
Reconstruction |
Peter Boernert, Philips Research,
Hamburg, Germany |
09:05 |
Current Issues in MR Spectroscopic
Image Reconstruction and Signal Processing |
Andrew A. Maudsley, University of
California, San Francisco, CA, USA |
|