| |
Prostate Cancer
Room 618 - 620
16:30 - 18:30
Chairs: Jelle O. Barentsz and Robert V. Mulkern
Time |
Prog # |
|
16:30 |
170. |
A Comparison of Image
Quality and Prostate Cancer Localization and Staging Performance Between
Body Array Coil and
Endorectal Coil MR
Imaging at 3T
Stijn W. Heijmink1,
Jurgen J. Fütterer1, Satoru Takahashi1, Tom W.
Scheenen1, Christina A. Hulsbergen-v.d. Kaa1,
J.
Alfred Witjes1, Jelle O. Barentsz1
1Radboud
University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands |
16:42 |
171. |
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced
Analysis of the Prostate at 3T with a Body Array Coil is Feasible and Increases
Prostate
Cancer Localization
Performance
Stijn W.
Heijmink1, Jurgen J. Fütterer1, Pieter C, Vos1,
Tom W. Scheenen1, Henkjan J. Huisman1,
Christina A.
Hulsbergen-v.d. Kaa1, J. Alfred Witjes1, Jelle O. Barentsz1
1Radboud
University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands |
16:54 |
172. |
3T MR of the Prostate:
Reducing Susceptibility Gradients by Inflating the Endo-Rectal Coil with a
Barium Suspension
Yael Rosen1, B
Nicolas Bloch1, Robert E. Lenkinski1, Robert L. Greenman1,
Robert P. Marquis1, Neil M. Rofsky1
1Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA |
17:06 |
173. |
MR Spectroscopic Imaging as a
Tool for Guiding Prostatic Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsy
Claudia Testa1,
Riccardo Schiavina1, Raffaele Lodi1, Eugenio Salizzoni1,
Barbara Corti1, Caterina Tonon1,
Manuela Coe1,
Walter F. Grigioni1, Antonia D'Errico1, Giuseppe Martorana1,
Romeo Canini1, Bruno Barbiroli1
1Universitŕ
di Bologna, Bologna, Italy |
17:18 |
174. |
Exclusion of False Positive
Identification of Prostate Cancer Using Diffusion Anisotropy
Junqian G. Xu1, Peter
A. Humphrey1, Adam S. Kibel1, Vamsidhar R. Narra1,
Sheng-Kwei Song1
1Washington
University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA |
17:30 |
175. |
Specific MRI Detection of
PSMA-Expressing Prostate Cancer Uisng 3C6 MAb-Conjugated SPIONs
Laurel O.
Sillerud1, Natalie L. Adolphi2, Rita Serda1,
Marco Bisoffi1, Ming Ji1
1University
of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; 2New Mexico Resonance,
Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA |
17:42 |
176. |
A Clinical Comparison of
Rigid and Inflatable Endorectal Coil Probes for MRI and 3D MRSI of the Prostate
Susan Moyher Noworolski1,
Jason C. Crane1, Daniel B. Vigneron1, John Kurhanewicz1
1UCSF,
San Francisco, California, USA |
17:54 |
177. |
Assessment of Pharmacokinetic
Parameters by Different Models in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI of Prostate
Guang Jia1, Johannes
T. Heverhagen1, Jiachao Liang1, Klaus T. Baudendistel1,
Andrea L. Levine1, Thomas J. Rosol1, Michael V.
Knopp1
1The
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA |
18:06 |
178. |
Quantitative Analysis of
Benign Prostate Hyperplasia with Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
Feiyu Li1, Xiaoying
Wang1, Yufeng Xu1, Jiangxi Xiao1, Xuexiang
Jiang1
1Peking
University First Hospital, Beijing, People’s Republic of China |
18:18 |
179. |
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced
Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Biologic Marker to Non-Invasively Assess the
Effect of
Finasteride on Prostatic
Suburethral Microcirculation
Guang Jia1, Johannes
T. Heverhagen1, Hans Polzer1, Richard V. Jacko1,
Jiachao Liang1, Jun Zhang1,
Andrea L. Levine1,
Thomas J. Rosol1, Michael V. Knopp1
1The
Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA |
|