TRADITIONAL
POSTERS Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1407. Quantitative Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) at Ultra-High Field Alexander Graeme Gardener1, Penny Ann Gowland1, Susan Tracy Francis1 1University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
1408. Improved Inversion Efficiency in Arterial Spin Labeling Using Adiabatic Null Pulses Esben Thade Petersen1, 2, Xavier Golay1, 3 1National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Singapore, Singapore
1409. A New ASL Scheme of Repeated Labeling Based on FAIR Sequence Yasuhiro Fujiwara1, 2, Hirohiko Kimura3, Hiroyuki Kabasawa4, Yoshiyuki Ishimori5, Isao Yamaguchi1, Tosiaki Miyati2, Kyouji Higashimura1, Harumi Itoh3 1Fukui University Hospital, Fukui, Japan; 2Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan; 3University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan; 4GE Yokokawa Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan; 5Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan
1410. Dynamic Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging at 4T Using Parallel Imaging: Effects on Parametric Mapping Jim Ji1, Xiaoping Zhu2, 3, Kaloh Li2, Norbert Schuff2, 3, Matthias Guenther4, David Feinberg4, Michael Weiner2, 3 1Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA; 2University of California at San Francisco; 3VA Medical Center, San Francisco; 4Advanced MRI Technologies, Sebastopol, California
1411. Full Brain Coverage Perfusion Measurements at 3T Using Pulsed Arterial Spin Labelling (PASL) and Parallel Imaging Steffen Volz1, Marlies Wagner, 2, Christine Preibisch, Heinrich Lanfermann 1J.W. Goethe University, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany; 2Henriettenstiftung,
1412. PROPELLER EPI: Application to ASL Perfusion Imaging Using FAIR Fu-Nien Wang1, Teng-Yi Huang2, Tzu-Chao Chuang3, Chen-Yu Chen4, Hsiao-Wen Chung3, Kenneth K. Kwong5 1National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; 3National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 4Tri-service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 5Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1413. A Transient Model of Off-Resonance Saturation for Single-Coil CASL Weiying Dai1, Oscar L. Lopez1, H. Michael Gach, 12 1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 2Nevada Cancer Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
1414. Model-Free Arterial Spin Labelling CBF Quantification Using Regional Arterial Input Functions Identified by Factor Analysis Linda Knutsson1, Karin Markenroth Bloch2, Anders Nilsson1, Adnan Bibic3, Stig Holtås1, Ronnie Wirestam3, Freddy Ståhlberg, 3 1MR Division, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; 2Philips Medical Systems, Lund, Sweden; 3Lund University, Lund, Sweden
1415. Three-Compartment Modeling of the Arterial-Spin-Labeling Data at Different Post-Labeling Delays with and Without Flow-Attenuating Gradient Tsukasa Nagaoka1, Xiaodong Zhang1, Robbie Champion1, Yoji Tanaka1, Govind Nair1, Edward J J. Auerbach2, Timothy Q. Duong1 1Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
1416. On the Feasibility of White Matter Arterial Spin Labeling Measurements Peter van Gelderen1, Jacco Adrianus de Zwart1, Jeff Hendricus Duyn1 1NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1417. Measurement of Deep Gray Matter Perfusion Using a Segmented True FISP ASL Method at 3T Elan Grossman1, Ke Zhang1, Jing An2, Abram Voorhees3, Maria Matilde Inglese1, Yulin Ge1, Jian Xu3, Qun Chen1 1NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 2Siemens Medical Solutions, Beijing, China; 3Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA
1418. Reproducibility and Convergence of CASL Perfusion MRI at 3.0 Tesla Aart J. Nederveen1, Xandra W. van den Tweel1, Marianne M.A. van Walderveen1, Karin Fijnvandraat1, Cristina Lavini1, Charles B.L.M. Majoie1 1Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
1419. Reproducibility of Pseudo-Continuous ASL at 1.5T and 3T Ruth L. O'Gorman1, 2, Hannah Joan Coward1, 2, Fernando O. Zelaya2, David C. Alsop3, Steven C.R. Williams2 1King's College Hospital, London, UK; 2Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK; 3Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1420. Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Imaging of the Thyroid Gland Christina Schraml1, Andreas Boss1, Petros Martirosian1, Nina F. Schwenzer1, Claus D. Claussen1, Fritz Schick1 1University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, BW, Germany
1421. Fast Whole-Brain Perfusion fMRI Using 3D GRASE Slab-Selective IR with Background Suppression André Bongers1, Matthias Guenther1 1mediri GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
1422. Complex Analysis of ASL fMRI Data Yields More Focal Activation Daniel B. Rowe1, Luis Hernandez-Garcia2, Gregory R. Lee2 1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; 2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
1423. Quantification of Rodent Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF) in Normal and High Flow States Using Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging Susanne Wegener1, 2, Wen-Chau Wu1, 3, Joanna Elizabeth Perthen1, Eric Che Wong1 1University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; 2Berlin Neuroimaging Center, Berlin, Germany; 3University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1424. Quantification of Cerebral Blood Flow and Vascular Territories in Normotensive and Hypertensive Rats Fernando Fernandes Paiva1, 2, Erica C. Henning1, Alberto Tannus2, Afonso C. Silva1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
1425. Comparison of Four Quantitative Pulsed ASL Methods for Mouse Brain Perfusion MRI Frank Kober1, Guillaume Duhamel1, Patrick J. Cozzone1 1UMR CNRS n 6612, Faculté de Médecine, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France
1426. Multiresolution Strategy to Estimate Arterial Transit Time and Cerebral Blood Flow Maps in Rhesus Monkeys Xiaodong Zhang1, Tsukasa Nagaoka1, Robbie Champion1, Timothy Q. Duong1 1Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
1427. Regional Differences in Cerebral Perfusion Parameters in Non-Human Primates: Comparison Between DSC and ASL Perfusion Imaging Yoji Tanaka1, Tsukasa Nagaoka1, Xiadong Zhang1, Robbie Champion1, Timothy Q. Duong1 1Yerkes
National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia,
USA Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1428. Multi-Resolution Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI for Improved Kinetic Modeling William S. Kerwin1 1University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
1429. Does the Presence of an Intravascular Contrast Agent Affect the Analysis of DCE-MRI Data? Marine Beaumont1, 2, Régine Farion1, 2, Christoph Segebarth1, 2, Chantal Remy1, 2, Emmanuel L. Barbier1, 2 1U594, Grenoble, France; 2Universite Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
1430. An Efficient Interpretation of DCE-MRI Data for Cancer Treatment Assessment Poe-Jou Chen1, 2, Wei-Ting Zhang2, 3, Emmanuelle di Tomaso3, Dan Duda3, Rakesh K. Jain3, Tracy T. Batchelor3, A. Gregory Sorensen2, 3 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1431. A Combined Diffusion-Perfusion Model for the Analysis of DCE-MRI Data Martin Pellerin1, Thomas Eddison Yankeelov2, Martin Lepage1 1Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada; 2Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1432. Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Models in Quantitative Analysis of T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Qing Yuan1, R. Allen White1, Edward F. Jackson1 1The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
1433. Model Comparison and Reproducibility Test of DCE-MRI in Glioblastoma Patients Poe-Jou Chen1, 2, Wei-Ting Zhang2, 3, Emmanuelle di Tomaso3, Dan Gabriel Duda3, Rakesh K. Jain3, Tracy T. Batchelor3, A. Gregory Sorensen2, 3 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 3Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1434. 3T MRI Detection of Contrast Reagent Extravasation in the Normal Primate Brain Xin Li1, Steven G. Kohama1, Theodore R. Hobbs1, William D. Rooney1, Michael Jerosch-Herold1, Charles S. Springer, Jr. 1 1Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
1435. Assessment of Physiological Parameters Estimated by DCE MRI with Delayed or Dispersed Arterial Input Function Yeng-Peng Liao1, Ing-Tsung Hsiao1, Ho-Ling Liu1 1Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan
1436. The Impact of Different Arterial Input Function Models on Vascular Parameter Estimates Using DCE-MRI. Matthew Orton1, David Collins1, Simon Walker-Samuel1, James d'Arcy1, David Hawkes2, Martin Leach1 1Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK; 2University College London, London, UK
1437. In Vivo Assessment of Renal Blood Flow and Volume in Rat Kidney by Using a Macromolecular MRI Contrast Agent Didier Laurent1, Farid Sari-Sarraf, Rainer Kneuer, Sarah MacLaurin, Thomas Krucker, Silvia Pomposiello 1Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
1438. Dynamic Contrast Reagent Induced Differences in Transverse Relaxation and Susceptibility Shift Observed by Echo Planar Spectroscopic Imaging Gary Martinez1, Maria Luisa Garcia-Martin2, Xiaomeng Zhang1, Robert J. Gillies1 1University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA; 2Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas "Alberto Sols", Madrid, Spain
1439. High Resolution pHe Imaging of Tumors Xiaomeng Zhang1, Gary V. Martinez1, Maria L. Garcia-Martin2, Natarajan Raghunand1, Dezheng Zhao1, Robert J. Gillies1 1University
of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA; 2Institute of Biomedical
Research “Alberto Sols”, Madrid, Spain Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1440. Can Regional Cerebral Blood Volume Be Extracted from T2-Decay Curves? Thomas Ernst1, Linda Chang1 1University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
1441. Equivalence of Fourier and oSVD Deconvolution in Dynamic Perfusion Measurements: Mutual Filter Transform Peter Gall1, Birgitte F. Kjølby2, Valerij G. Kiselev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
1442. Realistic Model of Partial Volume Effect on the AIF in Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI Birgitte Fuglsang Kjølby1, Leif Østergaard1, Valerij G. Kiselev2 1Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 2University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1443. Arterial Input Function Measurements in the MCA: A Numerical Model Compared with Phantom Experiment Results Egbert Jan Bleeker1, M. A. van Buchem1, M. J.P. van Osch1 1Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
1444. Dynamic Perfusion Evaluation Based on a Tissue Model Peter Gall1, Kim Mouridsen2, Valerij G. Kiselev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
1445. Modelling the Bolus Dispersion from DSC-MRI Data Lisa Willats1, 2, Alan Connelly2, 3, Fernando Calamante2, 3 1UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK; 2Brain Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; 3University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
1446. Cerebral Blood Flow Estimation Using Local Tissue Reference Functions Jayme Cameron Kosior1, 2, Michael R. Smith1, Richard Frayne1, 2 1University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; 2Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
1447. A Novel Approach to Remove the Effect of Recirculation in Arterial Input Functions Michael Smith1, Marina Salluzzi1, 2, Richard Frayne, 13 1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Seaman Family MR Centre, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 3Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
1448. Robust DSC-MR Perfusion Using a Patient Motion Correction Scheme Robert Karl Kosior1, 2, Jayme Cameron Kosior1, 2, Richard Frayne1, 2 1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
1449. The Potential Sensitivity of Cerebral Blood Flow to Cross-Calibration Jayme Cameron Kosior1, 2, Robert Karl Kosior1, 2, Richard Frayne1, 2 1University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada; 2Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
1450. A Self Calibrating Pulse Sequence for Real Time Quantitative Cerebral Perfusion Wanyong Shin1, Timothy J. Carroll1 1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1451. Simultaneous T2 and T2* Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging Using a Multi-Echo Parallel Imaging Approach Rexford D. Newbould1, Stefan Skare1, Greg Albers1, Roland Bammer1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1452. Quantitative CBF Measurement by T1 Weighted MRI Is Possible at 3 Tesla Henrik Bo Wiberg Larsson1, 2, Adam Espe Hansen1, Hilde K. Berg3, Jette Frederiksen1, Olav Haraldseth2, 4 1Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark; 2Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; 3Sør-Trøndelag University College, Norway; 4St.Olav Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
1453. A Demonstration of T2 Leakage Effects on DSC CBV Measurements Douglas Edward Prah1, Eric Scott Paulson1, Kathleen Marie Schmainda1 1Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
1454. Towards Quantitative Dynamic Vessel Size Imaging in Humans Peter Gall1, Oliver Speck1, 2, Irina Mader1, Juergen Hennig1, Valerij G. Kiselev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
1455. A Perfusion Phantom for Diffusible and Non-Diffusible MR Tracers Behzad Ebrahimi1, 2, Scott David Swanson1, Timothy E. Chupp1, 2 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; 2Focus Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
1456. Assessment of Cerebral Hemodynamic in Patients with Schizophrenia by DSC-MRI Quantitative Imaging Denis Peruzzo1, Marcella Bellani2, Francesca Zanderigo1, Nicola Dusi2, Gianluca Rambaldelli2, Cinzia Perlini2, Michele Tansella2, Alessandra Bertoldo1, Claudio Cobelli1, Paolo Brambilla3 1University of Padova, Padova, Italy; 2University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 3University of Udine, Udine, Italy
1457. Cerebral Perfusion in Alzheimer's Disease Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI Rachel DiAnne McKinsey1, Zhifei Wen1, Sterling C. Johnson2, Alan B. McMillan1, Mary E. Meyerand1, Shelly Fitzgerald, Cynthia M. Carlsson, Gemma Gliori2, Sean B. Fain1 1University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 2Veterans Administration Hospital, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1458. Cluster Analysis from Multiple MR Image Classes Can Reduce User Bias and Improve Glioma Grading Kyrre Eeg Emblem1, Baard Nedregaard1, Terje Nome1, Paulina Due-Tonnessen1, David Scheie1, Olivera Casar Borota1, John K. Hald1, Atle Bjornerud1 1Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet Medical Center, Oslo, Norway
1459. Tissue Specificity of DCE-MRI Pharmacokinetic and Semi-Quantitative Parameters in Human Liver Metastasis Xiangyu Yang1, Jiachao Liang1, Johannnes Heverhagen2, Guang Jia1, Steffen Sammet1, Regina Koch1, Michael V. Knopp1 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; 2Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
1460. Gadolinium Based Steady-State Technique for Longitudinal Fractional Cerebral Blood Volume Mapping Kelvin K. Wong1, 2, Robert Mulkern, 23, Kemi Cui1, Stephen Wong1, 2 1Brigham
and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Harvard
Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 3Children's
Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Regional Analysis of the Normal Human Brain by Diffusion Imaging Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1461. Diffusion Patterns of the Putamen and Globus Pallidus, Evaluated with DTI Qidong Wang1, Xiaojun Xu1, Minming Zhang1, Fei Sun2 1First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People’s Republic of China; 2GE Healthcare China,
1462. Normal Regional Fractional Anisotropy and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of the Brain on 3T Christabel EC Lee1, David M. Thomasson1, Fernanda Tovar-Moll1, Eva H. Baker1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1463. Subdivisions of Mid-Sagittal Corpus Callosum by Cortico-Cortical Connectivity with QBI Tractography Yi-Ping Chao1, Su-Ping Tsao2, Kun-Hsien Chou2, Kuan-Hung Cho1, Chun-Hung Yeh2, Jyh-Horng Chen1, Ching-Po Lin2 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
1464. Do Differences in the Left-Right Fractional Anisotropy in the Language Tracts of Right Handed Individuals Correlate with Laterality of Functional Activation? Mayuresh S. Korgaonkar1, John J. Chen1, Susan Fiore1, Candice J. Perkins1, Nancy K. Squires1, Zengmin Yan1, Mark E. Wagshul1 1Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
1465. Tissue-Specific, Smoothing-Compensated Voxel-Based Analysis of DTI Data Jee Eun Lee1, Mariana Lazar1, Andrew L. Alexander1, Erin D. Bigler2, Moo K. Chung1, David Hsu1, Janet E. Lainhart2 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 2University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1466. 7T Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Q-Ball Imaging of the Human Brain In Vivo Duan Xu1, Eric T. Han2, Christopher P. Hess1, Douglas AC Kelley3, Daniel B. Vigneron1, 4, Meredith Metcalf1, 4, Pratik Mukherjee1 1UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA; 3GE Healthcare, San Francisco, California, USA; 4UCSF/UC Berkeley, San Francisco, Berkeley, California, USA
1467. Evaluation of Minimal Angular Discrimination for Q-Ball Imaging: A Phantom Study Kuan-Hung Cho1, Chun-Hung Yeh2, Hsuan-Cheng Lin2, Jyh-Horng Chen1, Ching-Po Lin2 1Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
1468. Mapping Relative Fiber Density with Composite Q-Ball and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Chun-Hung Yeh1, Kuan-Hung Cho2, Hsuan-Cheng Lin1, Ching-Po Lin1, 3 1Institute of Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2Interdisciplinary MRI/MRS Lab, Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 3Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
1469. Bayesian Analysis of Uncertainty in Q-Ball Imaging Hubert Fonteijn1, 2, Frans Verstraten1, David Norris3 1Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands; 2F.C. Donders Institute for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 3F.C. Donders Institute for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, Netherlands
1470. Comparison of Diffusion Tensor and Q-Ball Imaging of the Canine Myocardium YUNDI SHI1, YI JIANG2, EDWARD W. HSU1 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; 2Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
1471. Model-Based Bootstrap Resampling Methods for HARDI: Quantitation of ODF Uncertainty Without Multiple Acquisitions Jeffrey I. Berman1, SungWon Chung1, Christopher P. Hess1, Pratik Mukherjee1, Ying Lu1, Roland G. Henry1 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
1472. Deriving Scalar Maps from Diffusion Spectrum MRI Patric Hagmann1, 2, Gigandet Xavier2, Leila Cammoun2, Van J. Wedeen3, Philippe Maeder1, Jean-Philippe Thiran2, Reto Meuli1 1Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, VD, Switzerland; 2Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, VD, Switzerland; 3Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, Switzerland
1473. An Adaptive Regularization of Richardson Lucy Spherical Deconvolution to Reduce Isotropic Effects Flavio Dell'Acqua1, Paola Scifo1, Giovanna Rizzo, 12, Giuseppe Scotti1, Ferruccio Fazio1, 2 1San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; 2University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
1474. User-Independent Optimization of Spherical Deconvolution Ken Earl Sakaie1 1The Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 1475. Parametric Spherical Deconvolution: Inferring Multiple Fiber Bundles Using Diffusion MR Imaging Enrico Kaden1, Thomas R. Knösche1, Alfred Anwander1 1Max
Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig,
Germany
1476. Resolving White Matter Fiber Crossings with Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging Jens Hesselberg Jensen1, Liang Xuan1, Joseph A. Helpern1 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
1477. Disambiguation of Complex Subvoxel Fibre Configurations in High Angular Resolution Fibre Tractography Peter Savadjiev1, Jennifer Campbell1, Maxime Descoteaux2, Rachid Deriche2, G. B. Pike1, Kaleem Siddiqi1 1McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 2INRIA Sophia Antipolis, Sophia-Antipolis, France
1478. Estimating Number of Fiber Directions Per Voxel for Multiple Fiber DTI Tractography Chi-Wah Wong1, Manbir Singh1 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1479. Kissing or Crossing: Validation of DTI Tractography in Ground Truth Hardware Phantoms Wilhelmus LPM Pullens1, 2, Alard Roebroeck1, Rainer Goebel1 1Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands; 2Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
1480. Exponential Diffusion Tensors for Efficient Higher-Order DT-MRI Computations Angelos Barmpoutis1, Baba C. Vemuri1, Timothy M. Shepherd 1University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1481. Rapid Isotropic Diffusion Weighted Imaging Using PROPELLER Irvin Teh1, 2, Bingwen Zheng2, Joseph V. Hajnal1, Xavier Golay2, 3, David J. Larkman1 1Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK; 2Singapore Bioimaging Consortium, Singapore, Singapore; 3National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore
1482. High Resolution Radial Diffusion-Weighted Imaging at 7T Rebecca J. Theilmann1, Miriam Scadeng1, Lawrence R. Frank1, 2 1UCSD, La Jolla, California, USA; 2Veteran Affairs Medical Center San Diego,
1483. 3D Diffusion Tensor MRI with Isotropic Resolution Using a Steady-State Radial Acquisition Youngkyoo Jung1, Walter F. Block1, Alexey Samsonov1, Mariana Lazar1, Jing Liu1, Andrew L. Alexander1 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1484. High Spatial Resolution Diffusion Imaging with Inner Volume Acquisition at 7T Hiroyuki Kabasawa1, 2, Akira Nabetani1, 2, Hitoshi Matsuzawa2, Tsutomu Nakada2 1GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Hino-shi, Tokyo, Japan; 2Niigata University, Niigata-shi, Niigata, Japan
1485. Conjugate Gradient Correction and Reconstruction of Multishot Diffusion Weighted Variable Density EPI Ken-Pin Hwang1, Anja C. Brau2, Philip J. Beatty2, Edward F. Jackson3, Qing Yuan3, Gary J. Whitman3, Scott B. Reeder4 1General Electric Healthcare Technologies, Houston, Texas, USA; 2General Electric Healthcare Technologies, Menlo Park, California, USA; 3University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; 4University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
1486. Whole Blade Method for Robust PROPELLER DWI James G. Pipe1 1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
1487. The Employment and Validation of Keyhole Imaging Technique in MR Spin-Echo Diffusion Tensor Imaging Shu-Wei Sun1, Yu-Jen Chen2, K-H. Chou2, W-C. Chu2 1Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA; 2National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan
1488. Diffusion Weighted Imaging with a Limited Field of View Using Interleaved Multi-Slices Inner-Volume-Imaging DW HASTE Seong-Eun Kim1, Eun-Kee Jeong1, Dennis L. Parker1 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
1489. Diffusion Weighted Imaging with Reduced Susceptibility Artifact, Using 2D Singleshot DW-STimulated EPI (2D Ss-DWSTEPI) Eun-Kee (EK) Jeong1 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
1490. Parallel Diffusion-Weighted Single-Shot STEAM - Less Is More Matthias Küntzel1, Jens Frahm1 1Biomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, Göttingen, Germany
1491. Mixed-CPMG Radial-FSE for Diffusion Imaging at 3T Joelle E. Sarlls1, Theodore P. Trouard2, Carlo Pierpaoli1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
1492. Diffusion Weighted Imaging Using a Reduced-View Projection Reconstruction Imaging (RV-PRI) Yeji Han1, JinYoung Hwang1, Jun Young Chung1, 2, HyunWook Park1 1Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; 2Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Incheon, Republic of Korea
1493. Adiabatic Refocusing Pulses in 3T and 7T Diffusion Imaging Stefan Skare1, Priti Balchandani1, Rexford D. Newbould1, Roland Bammer1 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
1494. Benchmarking SAP-EPI and PROPELLER for Diffusion Imaging Samantha J. Holdsworth1, Roland Bammer1, Rexford D. Newbould1, Stefan Skare1 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
1495. High Resolution Diffusion Tensor Image Using Segmented FOV Tzu-Cheng Chao1, Yi-Jui Liu2, Teng-Yi Huang3, Fu-Nien Wang4, Hsiao-Wen Chung1, Ming-Ting Wu5, 6, Cheng-Yu Sandy Chen7 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2Feng-Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan; 3National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; 4National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 5Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; 6National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 7Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
1496. Extension of the Magic Gradient Amplitude Ratio Method Used to Minimize Background Gradient Cross-Terms in Diffusion-Weighted MR Jürgen Finsterbusch1, 2 1University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Neuroimage Nord, Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Germany
1497. In-Vivo, Human Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 7T: First Results Christopher John Wiggins1, Thomas Benner1, Graham Charles Wiggins1, Christina Triantafyllou1, Lawrence Wald1 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1498. Probing Short Diffusion Time Behavior by Oscillating Gradient Spin Echo Sequences Junzhong Xu1, Mark D. Does1, John C. Gore1 1Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1499. Probing Intracellular Structure by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging with Oscillating Gradients Junzhong Xu1, Mark D. Does1, John C. Gore1 1Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1500. SENSE Factor Optimization for Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Human Brain at 7T Steffen Sammet1, Regina Koch1, Okan M. Irfanoglu1, Petra Schmalbrock1, Raghu Machiraju1, Michael V. Knopp1 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
1501. Steady-State Free Precession Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Human Brain Fixed and In Vivo Tissue Eric Edward Sigmund1, Maria Fatima Falangola1, KelleyAnne McGorty1 1New York University, New York, New York, USA
1502. Too Many Peanuts Makes You Fat: Sensitivity of Diffusion Weighted Steady State Free Precession to Anisotropic Diffusion in Ex Vivo Brain Tissue Jennifer Andrea McNab1, Karla L. Miller1 1University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
1503. NMR Molecular Diffusion in the Presence of Distant Dipolar Field Interactions Wilson Barros1, John C. Gore1, Daniel F. Gochberg1 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
Encoding Schemes and Experimental Design Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1504. Comparison of the Tensor Estimation Quality for Icosahedral Gradient Encoding Schemes Sarah Charlotte Mang1, Daniel Gembris1, Reinhard Männer1 1University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, Germany
1505. Optimized DTI for Fibre Bundles of Known Predominant Orientation Sandra Huff1, Frederik Bernd Laun1, Bram Stieltjes1, Jan Klein2, Horst Hahn2, Lothar Rudi Schad1 1German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; 2MeVis Research, Bremen, Germany
1506. Evaluation of the Higher Order Tensor Estimation Quality for Established Gradient Encoding Schemes Sarah Charlotte Mang1, Daniel Gembris1, Reinhard Männer1 1University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Delaware, Germany
1507. Determining Optimum B Maximum Values for Diffusion Spectrum Imaging and Q-Ball Imaging in Clinical MRI System Li-Wei Kuo1, Van Jay Wedeen2, Chandan Mishra3, Timothy G. Reese2, Jyh-Horng Chen1, Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng4, 5 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 3Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India; 4National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 5National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
1508. Optimum b-Value Vs. SNR for Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Measurements Emine Ulku Saritas1, Jin Hyung Lee1, Dwight George Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1509. Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for the Admissibility of DTI Gradient Vectors RKS Rathore1 1IIT Kanpur, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India
1510. On the Effects of Random Subject Rotation on Icosahedral Diffusion Sampling Schemes in DT-MRI Susana Muñoz Maniega1, Mark E. Bastin1, Paul A. Armitage1 1University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Midlothian, UK
1511. Dependence of Eigenvector Coherence on B-Value Range Using the Bootstrap Method Ai Wern Chung1, P. G. Batchelor2, Chris A. Clark1 1UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK; 2UCL, London, UK
1512. Tradeoffs Between Tensor Orientation and Anisotropy in DTI: Impact of Diffusion Weighting Scheme Bennett Allan Landman1, Jonathan A. D. Farrell, 12, Seth A. Smith, 12, Susumu Mori1, Jerry L. Prince1, 3 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Kennedy Krieger, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 3Johns Hopkins University School, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Technical Developments in Diffusion MR Analysis Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1513. Wavelet Thresholding of Diffusion Tensor Images Tin Man Lee1, Usha Sinha1 1University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1514. Noise Analysis and Filtering for Diffusion Tensor Imaging Mustafa Okan Irfanoglu1, Steffen Sammet1, Regina Maria Koch1, Raghu Machiraju1, Michael V. Knopp1 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
1515. Tensor Estimation for DTI Using Non-Linear Conjugate Gradient Murat Aksoy1, Chunlei Liu1, Roland Bammer1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA 1516. Anisotropy Induced by Macroscopic Boundaries: Surface Normal Mapping Using DWI Evren Ozarslan1, Uri Nevo1, Peter J. Basser1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1517. Roughness: A Reshuffling-Variant Differential Geometric Index for DWI Evren Ozarslan1, Lin-Ching Chang1, Carlo Pierpaoli1, Peter J. Basser1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1518. Entropy-Based Characterization of Diffusion Anisotropy Nader Metwalli1, 2, Stephen LaConte1, Xiaoping Hu1 1Georgia Institute of Technology / Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
1519. Characterisation of Brain Anisotropy Using Diffusion MRI Marta Morgado Correia1, Sally Harding1, Thomas Adrian Carpenter1, Guy Williams1 1Wolfson Brain Imaging Centre, Cambridge, UK
1520. Is Pre-Optimization of DTI Data Necessary for Correct Interpretation of Group Differences of Regional Fractional Anisotropy? Siawoosh Mohammadi1, Harald Kugel2, Michael Deppe1 1University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany; 2Department of Radiology,
1521. Diffusion Tensor Shape and Size Encoded Colormaps Reveal Fiber Features in Human Brain Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging Dennis Lai-Hong Cheong1, Choie Cheio Tchoyoson Lim1, 2 1National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore, Singapore; 2Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore, Singapore
1522. Systematic Evaluation of Linear and Nonlinear DTI Estimation Methods: An Open Framework Bennett Allan Landman1, Susumu Mori1, Jerry L. Prince1, 2 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1523. A Novel DTI Method for Analyzing the Diffusion of Water in Retina Angelos Barmpoutis1, Saurav Chandra1, John R. Forder1, Baba C. Vemuri1 1University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
1524. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Detects and Quantifies Changes in Permeability in the Murine Retina Saurav Chandra1, Angelos Barmpoutis1, John R. Forder1 1University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
1525. An Improved Imaged-Based Finite Difference Method for Studying Water Diffusion in Tissues Junzhong Xu1, Mark D. Does1, John C. Gore1 1Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1526. Investigations of a DTI-Phantom with Properties Similar to In Vivo Neuronal Tissue Frederik Bernd Laun1, Bram Stieltjes1, Sandra Huff1, Lothar Rudi Schad1 1Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
1527. Application of Geometric Indices of Diffusion Tensor Imaging on Ischemic Cerebral Infarction: Comparison of Two Definitions Cheng-Shian Hsu1, Ming-Chung Chou2, 3, Yi-Jui Liu1, Chun-Jung Juan, 23, Te-Cheng Lai1, Tsai-Tzung Tzuo1, Hsiao-Wen Chung2, 3, Cheng-Yu Chen3 1Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 3Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 1528. Influence of Anisotropic Conductivity Measured Using DTI on the EEG Forward Solution: A Whole Human Head Sensitivity Analysis Daniel Güllmar1, Jens Haueisen, 12, Jürgen R. Reichenbach1 1Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Jena, Germany; 2Technical University Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany
Q Space & Restricted Diffusion, etc. Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1529. Compartment-Specific Q-Space Analysis of Isolated Nerves Itamar Ronen1, James Hamilton1, Dae-Shik Kim1 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1530. Experimental Parameters and Diffraction Patterns at High Q Diffusion MR: Experiments and Theoretical Simulations Amnon Bar-Shir1, Liat Avram1, Yaniv Assaf1, Peter J. Basser2, Yoram Cohen1 1Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 2The National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1531. Dynamic Displacement in Human Brain Studied Using Q-Space Diffusion MRI at a 3T Clinical Scanner Markus Nilsson1, Jimmy Lätt1, Hannah Rosquist1, Emil Nordh1, Anna Rydhög1, Sara Brockstedt1, Freddy Ståhlberg1 1Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
1532. Does Changes in Gradient Duration Influence Q-Space-Based Determinations of Displacement In Vivo? Emil Nordh1, Jimmy Lätt1, Markus Nilsson1, Anna Rydhög1, Sara Brockstedt1, Freddy Ståhlberg1 1Lund University, Lund, Sweden
1533. Effects of Gradient Amplitude and Duration on Q-Space Imaging Henry H. Ong1, Alex C. Wright1, Suzanne L. Wehrli2, Andre Souza1, Eric D. Schwartz1, Punam K. Saha1, Felix W. Wehrli1 1University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 2Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1534. Using Q-Space Diffusion MRI for Structural Studies of a Biological Phantom at 3T Clinical Scanner Anna Rydhög1, Jimmy Lätt1, Markus Nilsson1, Emil Nordh1, Sara Brockstedt1, Eric Carlemalm1, Ronnie Wirestam1, Freddy Ståhlberg1 1Lund University, Lund, Sweden
1535. Quantification of Restricted Diffusion Via Kurtosis and Q-Space Imaging Frank Peeters1, Dennis Rommel1, Thierry Duprez1 1St-Luc University Hospital, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
1536. Non Parametric Approach for Axon Diameter Distribution Estimation from Diffusion Measurements Yaniv Assaf1, Peter J. Basser2 1Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; 2National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1537. Direction-Sensitive Perfusion with Q-Space MRI: Phantom Validation and Calf-Muscle Probing Dimitrios C. Karampinos1, Kevin F. King2, John G. Georgiadis1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
1538. Unified Mathematical Model of Q-Space and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Robert W. Cox, PhD1 1NIMH/NIH/DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1539. Simulation and Experimental Verification of the Diffusion in the Interstitial Space Els Fieremans1, Steven Delputte1, Yves De Deene2, Yves D'Asseler1, Eric Achten2, Ignace Lemahieu1 1Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 2Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
1540. A Simulation Framework for Diffusion Weighted MRI in Digitalized Neurons: Extracting Cytoarchitectural Parameters Using a New Theoretical Model for Diffusion Niels Buhl1, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen1 1University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark
1541. Limits on Measuring Axon Diameters In Vivo Using Diffusion MRI Daniel C. Alexander1, Derek K. Jones2 1UCL (University College London), London, UK; 2University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
1542. Modelling Diffusion Data Using a Stretched-Exponential Model : Pitfalls in Estimation Methodology Matthew Orton1, David Collins1, Sophie Riches1, Martin Leach1 1Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
1543. Is the Diffusion Biexponential in Brain Grey Matter? Valerij G. Kiselev1, Kamil A. Il'yasov1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany 1544. Contrast Similarity Between FA and T2* Studied in White Matter of the Human Brain at 3.0 and 7.0 T Tie-Qiang Li1, S L. Talagala2, Alan P. Koretsky2, J Duyn2 1NINDS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2NINDS, USA
1545. Diffusion Tensor Imaging Reviles the Evolution of Neuronal Cell Membrane Damage in Stroke Patients: A Simulation Study Koji Sakai1, Kei Yamada2, Hiroyuki Oouchi2, Tsunehiko Nishimura2 1Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; 2Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1546. Multi-Tensor Tractography Enables Better Depiction of Motor Pathways Kei Yamada1, Koji Sakai2, Frank GC Hoogenraad3, Ronald Holthuizen3, Kentaro Akazawa1, Hirotoshi Ito, Hiroyuki Oouchi1, Shigenori Matsushima1, Takao Kubota1, Tsunehiko Nishimura1 1Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan; 2Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; 3Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands
1547. Reduction of Partial Volume Artifacts in DTI Tractography by Post-Processing Darryl Hwa Hwang1, Aarti Shetty1, Amrita Rajagopalan1, Manbir Singh1 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1548. Anatomical Connectivity Mapping Karl Vincent Embleton1, David M. Morris1, Hamied A. Haroon1, Matt A. Lambon Ralph1, Geoff J. Parker1 1University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
1549. Probabilistic Connectivity Using Kullback-Leibler Distance Jee Eun Lee1, Moo K. Chung1, David Hsu1, Andrew L. Alexander 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1550. Multiple Streamline Tractography Approach with High Angular Resolution Diffusion Imaging Data Yi-Ping Chao1, Chun-Hung Yeh2, Kuan-Hung Cho1, Jyh-Horng Chen1, Ching-Po Lin2 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
1551. Integration of Magnetoencephalography and Q-Ball Tractography in the Visual Function Chia-Yen Yang1, Yi-Ping Chao2, Ching-Po Lin1 1National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
1552. Long Diffusion Time Improves DTI Tractography Swati D. Rane1, 2, Timothy Q. Duong2 1Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; 2Yerkes Imaging Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
1553. Representative Colour Schemes for Visualisation of Diffusion Tensor Tractography Data Thomas Richard Barrick1, Ian Nigel Lawes1, Chris A. Clark2 1Saint George's, University of London, London, UK; 2University College London, London, UK
1554. Reduction of False Positive Valued Area by Combining Probability Maps Björn Wolf Kreher1, Irina Mader1, Jürgen Hennig1, Kamil A. Il'yasov1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1555. Resolution-Dependent Differences in Fiber Tracking and Quantification Jan Klein1, Peter Erhard2, Simon Hermann1, Olaf Konrad1, Horst Karl Hahn1, Dieter Leibfritz2, Heinz-Otto Peitgen1 1MeVis Research, Bremen, Germany; 2FB 2 (Chemistry) and Center of Advanced Imaging (CAI), Bremen, Germany
1556. Template-Based Automatic DTI Fiber Bundle Labeling Song Zhang1, Stephen Correia2, David H. Laidlaw3 1Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA; 2Brown Medical School, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, USA; 3Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
1557. Paint and Track: Surface-Based ROI Selection in DTI Fiber Tracking Xin Guan1, Song Lai1, John Lackey1, Jianrong Shi1, Udomchai Techavipoo1, Klaus Mueller2, Ashwini Sharan1, Adam Flanders1, David W. Andrews1 1Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 2Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA
1558. A High Order Accurate and Robust Fiber Tractography with Diffusion Tensor Imaging Yonggang Lu1, Jing Qi1, Dehang Wang1, Adam Anderson2, John Gore2, Zhaohua Ding2 1The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1559. Algorithm and SNR Dependence of DTI Fiber Tractography Bin Chen1, Susumu Mori2, Allen W. Song1 1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; 2The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1560. How Much Confidence Do We Have in a MRI Tractography Experiment? Xavier Gigandet1, Patric Hagmann, 12, Maciej Kurant1, Jean-Philippe Thiran1, Reto Meuli2 1Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne, Switzerland; 2University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
1561. Investigation of the Impact of Noise on Standard Fibre Tracking Algorithms Susanne Schnell1, Björn W. Kreher1, Jürgen Hennig1, Kamil A. Il'yasov1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1562. Visualizing Diffusion Tensor Imaging Data with Stereoscopic Vision Jihong Wang1, Steve Jackson1 1University of Texas MD Anderson Caner Center, Houston, Texas, USA
1563. Cranial Nerve Tractography with 3T PROPELLER Diffusion Tensor Imaging Hiroyuki Kabasawa1, 2, Yoshitaka Masutani1, Osamu Abe1, Tomohiko Masumoto1, Shigeki Aoki1, Kenji Asano2, Hitoshi Ikeda2, Naoto Hayashi1, Kuni Ohtomo1 1The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan; 2GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Hino-shi, Tokyo, Japan
1564. Advantages of Parallel Imaging for DTI-Based Fiber Tracking at 3T Bram Stieltjes1, 2, Benjamin Hyman2, Jan Rexilius3, Horst K. Hahn3, Marco Essig1, L G. Naul2, Val Runge2 1DKFZ, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany; 2Scott and White Hospital, Temple, Texas, USA; 3MeVis, Bremen, Germany
1565. A Spatial Model of White Matter Fiber Tracts Mahnaz Maddah1, William M. Wells, 12, Carl-fredrik Westin2, 3, Eric L. Grimson1, Simon K. Warfield4 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2Surgical Planning Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, USA; 3Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 4Surgical Planning Laboratory, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis St, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1566. Assessment of Non-Rigid Registration in Diffusion Tensor Tractography of Human Spinal Cord at 3T Martin Kavec1, Isabelle Delpierre1, Gil Cunha1, 2, Thierry Metens1, Danielle Balériaux1 1Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; 2Hospitais Universidade, Coimbra, Portugal
1567. Improving Diffusion Tensor Fiber Tracking by Acquiring Additional FLAIR EPI Data to Eliminate CSF Contamination Yen-Wei Cheng1, Ming-Chung Chou1, 2, Cheng-Yu Cheng2, Hsiao-Wen Chung1, 2 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan; 2Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
1568. Diffusion Tensor Spectroscopy and Imaging of Arcuate Fasciculus Jaymin Upadhyay1, 2, Kevin Hallock1, Mathieu Ducros1, Dae-Shik Kim1, Itamar Ronen1 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA 1569. Evaluation of Tractography-Based Parcellation with Human Thalamus Dae Jin Kim1, Hae-Jeong Park2, In Young Kim1, Sun I. Kim1 1Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea; 2Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
1570. Estimation of Brain Connectivity Using Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Resting Temporal Correlations Pawel Skudlarski1, Kanchana Jagannathan1, Vince D. Calhoune2, 3, Kristen McKiernan1, Godfrey D. Pearlson1, 3 1Olin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; 2The MIND Institute and University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; 3Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
1571. Topography of the Corpus Callosum – A Comparative DTI Study of Human and Rhesus Monkey Sabine Hofer1, Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt1, Roland Tammer1, Jens Frahm1 1Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany
1572. Reproducibility of DTI-Based Muscle Fiber Tracking Anneriet M. Heemskerk1, Tuhin K. Sinha1, Zhaohua Ding1, Charles P. Blyth1, Bruce M. Damon1 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1573. Fiber Statistics in the Corpus Callosum Jeffrey Thomas Duda1, Hui Zhang1, Hui Sun1, Tony J. Simon2, James C. Gee1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 2M.I.N.D.Institute, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, USA
1574. Reconstruction of the Optic Radiation by Means of Combined DTI and fMRI Kamil Gorczewski1, Ralf Saur1, Lindsay Sharpe2, Michael Erb1, Wolfgang Grodd1, Herbert Jaegle1, Uwe Klose1 1University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; 2University College London, London, UK
1575. Tract Based Spatial Statistics of Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Neuropsychiatric Systemic Lupus Erythematodus Reveals Diffuse Involvement of White Matter Tracts Bart Emmer1, Ilya Veer1, Gerda Steup-Beekman1, Tom Huizinga1, Mark van Buchem1, Jeroen van der Grond1 1Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
Effects of Age and Gender: Analyses by Diffusion Imaging Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1576. Age-Related Diffusivity Changes in Brain White Matter Fiber Bundles Elisabetta Pagani1, Federica Agosta1, Elda Judica1, Marcella Laganà2, Stefania Sala1, Luca Dall'Occhio1, Massimo Filippi1 1Scientific Institute and University Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; 2Scientific Institute Fondazione Don Gnocchi, Milan, Italy
1577. Effects of Gender and Handedness on Corticospinal Tracts: Tract Specific Analysis of Fractional Anisotrop Based on Diffusion Spectrum Imaging Su-Chun Huang1, Fang-Chen Yeh1, Yu-Chen Tsai2, Hsiao-Lan Wang1, Van Jay Wedeen3, Timothy G. Reese3, Nicolas Trost4, Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng1, 5 1National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 2University of California, Los Angeles, LA, California, USA; 3Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 4St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; 5National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
1578. Gender Differences in Water Diffusion of the Corpus Callosum: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study Andrea Kassner1, Fang Liu1, Januthy Tharmakulasingam1, Timothy Roberts2 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1579. Tract-Specific Effects of Sex and Age on Human White Matter Demonstrated with Quantitative MR Diffusion Tractography Paolo Gian Piero Nucifora1, Elias R. Melhem1, James W. Loughead1, Ruben C. Gur1, Raquel E. Gur1, Ragini Verma1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1580. Alterations in Brain Microstructure in ADHD by Diffusional Kurtosis Imaging Joseph A. Helpern1, 2, M F. Falangola1, 2, A Di Martino1, A Ramani1, J S. Babb1, C Hu1, J H. Jensen1, F X. Castellanos1 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 2The Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York, USA
1581. Cerebellar White Matter Development Lags Supratentorial White Matter Sona Saksena1, Rakesh K. Gupta1, Gyanendra Kumar Malik2, Nuzhat Husain2, Richa Trivedi1, Divya KS Rathore3, Ankur Purwar3, Ram KS Rathore3, Ponnada A. Narayana4 1Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 2King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India; 3Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India; 4University of Texas, Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
Uncertainty & Artifacts in Diffusion Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1582. Automated Judgment of Image Quality for Diffusion Tensor Imaging Hangyi Jiang1, 2, Peter C. M. van Zijl, 23, Susumu Mori1, 2 1Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 3Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1583. Quantitative Comparisons of Measurement Uncertainty in Human Brain Data with Different DTI Protocols Using a Wild Bootstrap Method Tong Zhu1, Xiaoxu Liu2, Patrick Connelly1, Jianhui Zhong1 1University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA; 2Univeristy of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
1584. A Scanner Stability Test for Diffusion Tensor Imaging Barjor Gimi1, Jonathan Chia2, Padmapriya Srinivasan1, Nancy K. Rollins1, 3 1The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA; 2Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; 3Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
1585. Quality Analysis of DTI Images Mustafa Okan Irfanoglu1, Steffen Sammet1, Regina Maria Koch1, Raghu Machiraju1, Michael V. Knopp1 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
1586. Characterizing DTI Image Quality and the Efficacy of Dyadic Sorting with a Capillary Phantom Nathan E. Yanasak1, 2, Jerry D. Allison1, Tom C.-C. Hu1 1Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA; 2University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA
1587. Diffusion Tensor Representations and Their Applications to DTI Error Propagation Cheng Guan Koay1, Lin-Ching Chang1, Carlo Pierpaoli1, Peter Joel Basser1 1NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1588. Contribution of Cardiac-Induced Brain Pulsation to the Noise of the Diffusion Tensor in Turboprop-DTI Minzhi Gui1, Ashish A. Tamhane1, Konstantinos Arfanakis1 1Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1589. Effect of Registration of Diffusion Weighted Images on Fractional Anisotropy NIRVISH SHAH1, BHARAT BISWAL1 1UMDNJ, NEWARK, New Jersey, USA
1590. Numeric Simulations for Optimization of Wild Bootstrap Technique as a Robust Estimator of DTI Measurement Uncertainty Tong Zhu1, Xiaoxu Liu1, Patrick Connelly1, Jianhui Zhong2 1University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA; 2Univeristy of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
1591. A Framework for Evaluating the Performance of EPI Distortion Correction Strategies in Diffusion Tensor MRI Minjie Wu1, 2, Lin-Ching Chang2, Alan S. Barnett2, Stefano Marenco2, Carlo Pierpaoli2 1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; 2National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1592. Correction of Geometric Distortions Due to Static Magnetic Field Inhomogeneities and Eddy Currents in SENSE DTI Trong-Kha Truong1, Bin Chen1, Allen W. Song1 1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
1593. Uncertainties of DTI Parameter Estimation Depend on the Fitting Algorithm: Monte Carlo Simulations and in-Vivo Data in Human Brain Ryan Fobel1, Nancy Lobaugh2, Greg J. Stanisz2 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Sunnybrook HSC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1594. Influence of the Noise Floor: Paradoxical Effects on DTI Frederik Bernd Laun1, Bram Stieltjes1, Lothar Rudi Schad1 1Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
1595. Influence of Linear Steady Background Gradients on the Accuracy of Molecular Diffusion Anisotropy Evaluation Using MRI Cristina Rossi1, 2, Andreas Boss1, Petros Martirosian1, Guenter Steidle1, Silivia Capuani2, 3, Claus D. Claussen1, Bruno Maraviglia, 34, Fritz Schick1 1Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; 2CNR-INFM CRS-SOFT c/o La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; 3Enrico Fermi Center, Rome, Italy; 4La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
1596. Effect of DTI Bootstrap Bias on the DTI Uncertainty Measurements and Probabilistic Tractography SungWon Chung1, 2, Jeffrey I. Berman2, Caroline Rae3, Roland G. Henry1, 2 1University of California San Francisco & Berkeley, San Francisco, California, USA; 2University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; 3Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
1597. Partial Volume Effects in DTI Arnold Skimminge1, 2, Karam Sidaros3, Matthew Liptrot3, Annette Sidaros3 1Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark; 2Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; 3Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
1598. Implications of Heterogeneous Variance of Tensor-Derived Quantities for Group Comparisons John David Carew1, Grace Wahba, Peter J. Basser2 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 2National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
1599. An Optimized Tensor Orientation Strategy for Non-Rigid Alignment of DT-MRI Data Wim Van Hecke1, Alexander Leemans1, Evert Vandervliet2, Paul M. Parizel2, Jan Sijbers1 1VisionLab, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium; 2University Hospital Antwerp, University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
1600. Noise-Induced Bias in Low-Direction Diffusion Tensor MRI: Replication of Monte-Carlo Simulation with In-Vivo Scans Casey Brett Goodlett1, P Thomas Fletcher2, Weili Lin3, Guido Gerig3 1UNC Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; 2University of Utah, Utah, USA; 3UNC Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
1601. Variational Framework for the Separation of Partially Volumed Tensor Compartments in the Human Brain Ofer Pasternak1, Nir Sochen2, Natahn Intrator1, Yaniv Assaf2, 3 1Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 2Tel-Aviv University, Israel; 3Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Israel
1602. The Cone of Uncertainty Is Elliptical: Implications for DTI Tractography Cheng Guan Koay1, Lin-Ching Chang1, Peter Joel Basser1 1NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1603. The Effect of Linear and Micro-Circular Shear Flow on Diffusion MR Measurements Uri Nevo1, Michal Komlosh1, Evren Ozarslan1, Cheng Guan Koay1, Peter Joel Basser1 1NIH\NICHD, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1604. Can We Expect Reproducible and Unbiased Information from Denoised Diffusion Tensor Imaging with Low SNR? Klaus Rudolf Hahn1, Sergei Prigarin2, Khader Hasan3 1gsf-National Research Center for Environment & Health, Neuherberg, Bavaria, Germany; 2Institute Computational Mathematics, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; 3University of Texas Medical School, Houston, USA
1605. Influence of Microscopic Background Gradients on the Diffusion Parameters Observed in a Fiber Model System Tina Hartmann1, 2, Martin A. Koch1, 2, Jürgen Finsterbusch1, 2 1University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Neuroimage Nord, Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Germany
1606. Comparison of Linear Combination Filtering to DTI and MTR in Whole Brain Myelin-Water Imaging Sonya Bells1, Drew Morris1, Logi Vidarsson1, 2 1The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1607. Visualization of Laminar and Columnar Organization in Rat Olfactory Bulb Using Diffusion Tensor MRI Waqas Majeed1, Kerry Ressler, Shella Keilholz1 1Georgia Institue of Technology / Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
1608. Postnatal Neural Development of the Brain: In Vivo Diffusion Tensor Imaging Kurt Hermann Bockhorst1, Maged Kamel2, Pallavi Ahobila1, Jaivijay Ramu1, Jarek Wosik2, Regino Perez-Polo3, Ponnada A. Narayana1 1UTH Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA; 2University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA; 3University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA
1609. A Window for High-Resolution Post-Mortem DTI: Mapping Contrast Changes in Neural Degeneration Bennett Allan Landman1, Hao Huang1, Jerry L. Prince1, 2, Sarah H. Ying1 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1610. Diffusion Weighted MRI of Closed Head Injury and Treatment with PEG (Polyethylene-Glycol) in Rats SK K. Hekmatyar1, P S. Smucker2, P N. Hopewell1, R B. Borgens3, N Bansal1 1Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; 2Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; 3Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
1611. Mapping Mossy Fiber Sprouting in Epileptic Rat Hippocampus with Diffusion Spectrum Magnetic Resonance Imaging Li-Wei Kuo1, Chun-Yao Lee2, Chih-Chuan Chen3, Horng-Huei Liou2, 3, Van Jay Wedeen4, Jyh-Horng Chen1, Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng2, 3 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; 3National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 4Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1612. Manganese-Enhanced and Diffusion Spectrum MRI of Hippocampal Cytoarchitecture in Epileptic Rats Jun-Cheng Weng1, Chun-Yao Lee2, Horng-Huei Liou2, Jyh-Horng Chen1, Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng2 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
1613. Non-Invasive In Vivo MRI Angiogenesis Assays Rosalie Lemay1, Claude Pépin1, Luc Tremblay1, Benoit Paquette1, Martin Lepage1 1Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
1614. Quantitative Diffusion Tensor Imaging in a Murine Model of Parkinson’s Disease Michael D. Boska1, Khader M. Hasan2, Danette Kibuule1, Jaylene A. Nelson1, Theresa Hahn1, Ashley Reynolds1, Howard E. Gendelman1, R Lee Mosley1 1University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA; 2University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
1615. Early Changes in the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Following Ischemic Stroke in Canines Ashley D. Harris1, 2, Richard Frayne1, 2 1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
1616. Cortical FA Mapping of Developing Rat Brains Hao Huang1, Akira Yamamoto1, Peter C.M. van Zijl1, 2, Susumu Mori1, 2 1Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1617. The Effect of Myelin on the Q-Space and Conventional DTI Indices in Excised Myelin-Deficient Rat Brains Amnon Bar-Shir1, Ian D. Duncan2, Yoram Cohen1 1Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; 2University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1618. Analysis of High B-Value Diffusion Data May Highlight In Vivo Cellular Changes Rebecca Milman Marsh1, James A. Bankson1, Nalini Patel1, R Jason Stafford1, Nicholas HA Terry1, John D. Hazle1 1U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
1619. Brain Tissue Decomposition and Its Effects on Diffusion Tensor Images Helen E. D'Arceuil1, Alex J. de Crespigny1 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1620. Diffusion Weighted Images in the Cat Visual Cortex at 9.4 T Reveal Extravascular Related ADC Decreases During Activation Essa Yacoub1, Kamil Uludag2, Kamil Ugurbil1, 2, Noam Harel1 1University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 2Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
1621. DW-MRI of Perfused and Thermally Controlled Neuronal Organotypic Cultures Uri Nevo1, Craig Vermont Stewart2, Elakkat Dharmaraj Gireesh2, Dietmar Plenz2, Peter Joel Basser1 1NIH\NICHD, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2NIH\NIMH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30 1622. Chemical Shift Correction in Bipolar Multi-Echo Sequences for Water and Fat Separation Wenmiao Lu1, Scott B. Reeder2, Bruce L. Daniel1, Brian Andrew Hargreaves1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 2University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1623. Fast Single Breath-Hold 3D Abdominal Imaging with Water-Fat Separation Peter Koken1, Holger Eggers1, Peter Börnert1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany
1624. An Algorithm for Lipid-Water Separation in the Presence of T2* Decay Christian Graff1, Eric W. Clarkson1, Zhiqiang Li1, Maria I. Altbach1 1University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
1625. Highly Accelerated IDEAL Vs Fat Sat Acquisition: A Comparison for Volumteric Liver Imaging Ajit Shankaranarayanan1, Dan Sodickson2, Ananth Madhuranthakam3, Andres Carrillo4, Sanjay Joshi5, Aaron Grant6, Phil Robson6, Huanzhou Yu7, Ann Shimakawa7, Scott Reeder8, Jean Brittain9, Charlie McKenzie6 1GE Healthcare, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2New York University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA; 3GE Healthcare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 4GE Healthcare, Evanston, Illinois, USA; 5GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA; 6Beth Israel Deconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 7GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA; 8University of Wisconsion, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 9GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1626. Dixon Fat-Water Separation by Dual-TR bSSFP Sequence Teng-Yi Huang1 1National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, Taiwan
1627. Fat-Water Separation in Alternating Repetition Time (ATR) Balanced SSFP Tolga Cukur1, Dwight George Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1628. Fat Suppression with Weighted-Combination SSFP Tolga Cukur1, Dwight George Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1629. A Linear Prediction Approach to Joint Estimation of Water/Fat Images and Field Inhomogeneity Map Diego Hernando1, Justin Haldar1, Jingfei Ma2, Zhi-Pei Liang1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
1630. Non-Iterative Decomposition of Fat and Water Using Chemical Shift Mathews Jacob1, Bradley P. Sutton2 1University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Illinois, USA
1631. T2-Weighted Volumetric Acquisition with Water-Fat Separation in a Clinically Feasible Scan Time Ananth Jayaseelan Madhuranthakam1, Reed F. Busse2, Huanzhou Yu3, Ann Shimakawa3, Philip M. Robson4, Anja CS Brau3, Philip J. Beatty3, Scott B. Reeder5, Jean H. Brittain2, Charles A. McKenzie4 1GE Healthcare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 3GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA; 4Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 5University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1632. Fat-Fat Interations in Dixon-Variant Imaging Mark Bydder1, Gavin Hamilton1, Takeshi Yokoo1, Michael S. Middleton1, Alyssa D. Chavez1, Claude Sirlin1 1University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
1633. Phase Sensitive Fat Suppression SSFP with Phase Correction Zhongliang Zu1, Kun Zhou1, Haitao Zhu1, Shigang Zhang2, Shanglian Bao1 1Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Siemens Mindit MRI Center, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
1634. Faster Dixon Fat-Water Imaging with Multiplex RF Pulses Kuan J. Lee1 1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
1635. Simultaneous Off-Resonance Correction and Fat/Water Separation for Non-Cartesian Trajectories Using a Multi-Frequency Least-Squares Approach Paul Thomas Gurney1, Brian Andrew Hargreaves1, Dwight George Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1636. Imaging Water, Fat, and Silicone with Regional Iterative Phasor Extraction (RIPE) Qing-San Xiang1 1University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
1637. Histogram Based Water and Fat Identification in a Symmetrically Sampled Dual Echo Dixon Technique Jingfei Ma1, Zachary William Slavens2, Anthony T. Vu2 1University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
1638. Multi-Resolution Non-Iterative Field Map Estimation for Water and Fat Separation Wenmiao Lu1, Garry E. Gold1, Huanzhou Yu2, Brian Andrew Hargreaves1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA
1639. SENSE EPI Water-Fat Imaging Li An1, David M. Thomasson1, Lawrence L. Latour1, Steven J. Warach1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1640. T1-Contrast Enhanced Single-Point Dixon with Integrated PSIR Based on Orthogonal Phase Jong Bum Son1, Jim Ji1 1Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1641. Diffusion Effects in Passband Balanced SSFP fMRI Markus Klarhöfer1, Oliver Bieri1, Klaus Scheffler1 1University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1642. LOW-TIDE: Linear Filter Based Optimal Window Transition to Driven Equilibrium for B-SSFP Sequences Neville Gai1, Lawrence Yao1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1643. Guiding Off-Resonance Interventional MR with Dephased Fast Low-Angle Positive-Contrast Steady-State Free Precession Imaging Ioannis Koktzoglou1, Debiao Li1, Rohan Dharmakumar1 1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1644. Reducing the TR in SSFP Imaging with Ramp-Sampled FIESTA Glenn S. Slavin1 1GE Healthcare, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
1645. Cartesian Continuous Sampling with Unequal Gradient Strengths Candice A. Bookwalter1, Mark A. Griswold2, Jeffrey L. Sunshine2, Jeffrey L. Duerk, 12 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; 2University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1646. Slice Dispersed Linear Combination SSFP - A New Tool for Banding Reduction Keith Wachowicz1, B G. Fallone1 1Medical Physics, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
1647. Off-Resonance Dependent Slice Profile Effects in Balanced SSFP Imaging Felix Staehle1, Jochen Leupold1, Jürgen Hennig1, Michael Markl1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1648. Magnitude-Weighted Complex-Sum SSFP Tolga Cukur1, Neal Kepler Bangerter1, Dwight George Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1649. Real-Time Balanced Steady State Free Precession Imaging with Through-Plane Flow Akin Yucetas1, 2, Michael A. Guttman3, John A. Derbyshire3, Elliot R. McVeigh3, Christine H. Lorenz4, Robert Lederman3, Cengizhan Ozturk3 1Siemens Corporate Research, Princeton, New Jersey, USA; 2Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey; 3NHLBI, NIH, DHHS, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 4Siemens Corporate Research, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1650. SAR-Reduced TrueFISP Using Variable Flip Angels: Influence on In-Plane Resolution and SNR Properties Dominik Paul1, Maxim Zaitsev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1651. On Magnetization Transfer and Balanced SSFP Oliver Bieri1, Klaus Scheffler1 1University of Basel / University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1652. An Extensible, Graphical Environment for Pulse Sequence Design and Simulation William Ryan Overall1, John M. Pauly1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1653. IDEA Simulator Extension: A Sequence Analyzer Claus Kiefer1, Gerhard Schroth1 1University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
1654. MR Fluoroscopy Employing Interactive Pulse Sequence Switching Martin John Graves1, 2, Pauline Wong2, Richard Thomas Black1, David John Lomas2 1Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK; 2University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
1655. A Real-Time System for Interactive Large FOV MR Imaging Mohammad Sabati1, 2, Christopher Hahn1, Megan Ann Bates1, Mark Jason Verano1, Michael J. Haakstad2, Richard Frayne1, 2 1University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; 2Calgary Health Region, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
1656. Sliding Phase Encoding in Table Motion Direction for 3D Continuously Moving Table Imaging Shinji Kurokawa1, Yo Taniguchi1, Kaori Narahara1, Suguru Yokosawa1, Hisaaki Ochi1, Yoshitaka Bito1 1HItachi Ltd., Kokubunji-shi, Tokyo, Japan
1657. Rapid RF-Mapping Using TurboSTEAM Gunther Helms1, Jürgen Finsterbusch2, Peter Dechent1 1University of Göttingen, Faculty of Medicine, Göttingen, Germany; 2Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
1658. Fast Slice-Selective B1 Mapping Mika W. Vogel1, Hans-Peter Fautz, Rolf Schulte, Patrick Gross, Yudong Zhu2 1GE Global Research - Europe, Garching bei Muenchen, Bayern, Germany; 2GE Global Research - USA,
1659. A New Method for Tailored 2-D Excitation Using Frequency and Gradient Modulation Based on Rapid Passage Nathaniel James Powell1, Jang-Yeon Park1, Michael Garwood1 1University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
1660. Total Removal of Unwanted Echoes in Harmonic Phase MRI (TRUE-HARP) Khaled Z. Abd-Elmoniem1, Jerry L. Prince1, 2 1Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Johns Hopkins University Medical School, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1661. How to Unwind in the Low Field Limit Zheng Xian1, Chris Bidinosti1, Jason L. Hobson1, Michael E. Hayden1 1Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
1662. Pulse Sequence for Comprehensive Evaluation of Renal Artery Stenosis Hyun Jeong1, Ty A. Cashen1, James C. Carr2, Timothy John Carroll1, 2 1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 2Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1663. Radial Single-Shot STEAM MRI Kai Tobias Block1, Alexander Karaus1, Jens Frahm1 1Biomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, Goettingen, Germany
1664. A New Plane Orientation Scheme for Spiral Projection Imaging Ryan Keith Robison1, Eric Aboussouan1, James G. Pipe1 1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
1665. Elliptical Field of View in PROPELLER MRI Ajit Devaraj1, James G. Pipe1 1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
1666. Quadrant Radial K-Space (Quark) – A New Trajectory in Between Radial and Cartesian. Kuan J. Lee1, Jim M. Wild1 1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
1667. Cog-Wheel Imaging: A Rapid Echo Shifted Technique Maxim Zaitsev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1668. Hilbert-Sampling in K-Space Wolf Blecher1, Daniel Gembris1, Reinhard Maenner1 1University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
1669. Signal Processing and Image Reconstruction for SWIFT Curtis Andrew Corum1, Steen Moeller1, Djaudat Idiyatullin1, Michael Garwood1 1University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
1670. Progress in Rapid and Short Acquisition Delay Imaging with SWIFT Curtis Andrew Corum1, Djaudat Idiyatullin1, Steen Moeller1, Ken Bricker1, Jutta M. Ellermann1, Michael Garwood1 1University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
1671. Echo-Planar Imaging with Multiple Echo Trains in a Single-Shot Using Stimulated Echoes Jürgen Finsterbusch1, 2, Wolfgang Weber-Fahr1, 2, Martin A. Koch1, 2 1University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; 2Neuroimage Nord, Hamburg-Kiel-Lübeck, Germany
1672. Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of a Projection Dephaser in 2D Gradient-Echo Imaging Nicky H.G.M. Peters1, Koen L. Vincken1, Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde1, Martijn van der Bom1, Christianus J.G. Bakker1 1University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1673. Predicting the Energy of Finite Time RF Pulses Patrick Le Roux1, Rolf F. Schulte2 1GE Healthcare, Palaiseau, France; 2GE Global Research, Munich, Germany
1674. Fast Sequence Optimization for Superior Signal Suppression with Multiple Hyperbolic Secant Pulses Ronald Ouwerkerk1 1Johns Hopkins University, SOM, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1675. Independent Phase Modulation for Dual-Slab 3D Imaging Brian A. Hargreaves1, Charles H. Cunningham2, John M. Pauly1, Bruce L. Daniel1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1676. Calibration Tools for RF Shim at Very High Field with Multiple Element RF Coils: From Ultra Fast Local Relative Phase to Absolute Magnitude B1+ Mapping Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele1, Carl Snyder1, Lance DelaBarre1, Gregor Adriany2, Tommy Vaughan1, Kamil Ugurbil1 1University of Minnesota, MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota, USA; 2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
1677. RF Pulse Design for High-Resolution Imaging with FLASE Joelle Karine Barral1, Michael Lustig1, Nikola Stikov1, Dwight G. Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1678. Dual-Band Adiabatic Selective Refocussing for Signal Suppression in High Field MR Ronald Ouwerkerk1 1Johns Hopkins University, SOM, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1679. Enhancement of In Vivo iZQC Signal by Spin Locking Pulse Jing Song1, Chulhyun Lee1, Gigi Galiana1, Rosa T. Branca1, Elizabeth Jenista1, Warren S. Warren1 1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
1680. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Saturation Pulses for Quantitative First-Pass Cardiac Perfusion MRI at 1.5T and 3T Daniel Kim1, Oded Gonen1, Niels Oesingmann2, Leon Axel1 1New York University, New York, USA; 2Siemens Medical Solutions, New York, USA
1681. High Spatial Resolution Multispectral Quantitative MRI of the Human Knee: Mixed-TSE Pulse Sequence Akira Murakami1, Jaroslaw Tkacz1, Hernan Jara1 1Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1682. New Slice-Selective Pulse Cascades Producing Uniform Tipping in Inhomogeneous RF Fields Gerald B. Matson1, 2, Lana G. Kaiser1, 3, Karl Young1, 2 1Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA; 2University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; 3Northern California Institute for Research and Education, San Francisco, California, USA
1683. Reducing Side Lobes and SAR in Parallel Transmission Using Variable Density Spirals Yinan Liu1, Jim Ji1 1Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA 1684. An Analysis of Reciprocity in Parallel MRI Yudong Zhu1 1GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, USA
1685. Joint Design of Trajectory and RF Pulses for Parallel Excitation Chun-yu Yip1, William Grissom1, Jeffrey A. Fessler1, Douglas C. Noll1 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
1686. RF Pulse Design Methods for Reduction of Image Artifacts in Parallel RF Excitation: Comparison of 3 Techniques on a 3T Parallel Excitation System with 8 Channels Adam Charles Zelinski1, Lawrence L. Wald1, 2, Kawin Setsompop1, Vijayanand Alagappan2, Borjan Alexsandar Gagoski1, Franz Hebrank3, Ulrich Fontius3, Franz Schmitt3, Elfar Adalsteinsson1 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 3Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany
1687. Reduced-Voltage RF Shimming for Adiabatic Pulse Design in Parallel Transmission Kawin Setsompop1, Larry L. Wald2, Elfar Adalsteinsson1 1Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, MGH, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1688. 3D RF Pulses for Parallel Transmission MRI Systems Ingmar Graesslin1, Sven Biederer1, Patrick Wilhelm1, Peter Vernickel1, Giel Mens2, Karl-Heinz Zimmermann3, Ulrich Katscher1, Peter Börnert1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands; 3TU-Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg, Germany
1689. Additive-Angle' Method for Fast Large-Tip-Angle RF Pulse Design in Parallel Excitation William A. Grissom1, Jeffrey A. Fessler1, Douglas C. Noll1 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
1690. Enforcing Strict Constraints in Multiple-Channel RF Pulse Optimization David O. Brunner1, Klaas P. Pruessmann1 1University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
1691. Designing Fast 3-D RF Excitations by Optimizing the Number, Placement and Weighting of Spokes in k-Space Via a Sparsity-Enforcement Algorithm Adam Charles Zelinski1, Kawin Setsompop1, Vivek K. Goyal1, Vijayanand Alagappan2, Ulrich Fontius3, Franz Schmitt3, Lawrence L. Wald1, 2, Elfar Adalsteinsson1 1MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 3Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany
1692. Array-Optimized Composite Pulse for Homogeneous Whole-Brain Inversion in High Field MRI Suk-hoon Oh1, Zhangwei Wang1, Michael B. Smith1, Christopher Michael Collins1 1The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
1693. RF Shimming Using a Multi-Element Transmit System in Phantom and In Vivo Studies Ulrich Katscher1, Peter Vernickel1, Ingmar Graesslin1, Peter Boernert1 1Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany
1694. Phase Constraint Relaxation in Parallel Excitation Pulse Design Adam B. Kerr1, Yudong Zhu2, John M. Pauly1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 2GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, USA
1695. Spectrum Optimized Parallel Excitation Pulse Design Yudong Zhu1, Joseph E. Piel1, Randy O. Giaquinto1, Ronald D. Watkins1, Thomas K. Foo1, Adam B. Kerr2, John M. Pauly2, Florian Wiesinger3, Mika Vogel3, Patrick Gross3 1GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, New York, USA; 2Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 3GE Global Research Center, Munich, Germany
1696. Multidimensional Arbitrary-Flip-Angle Parallel Transmit Pulse Design Using an Optimal Control Approach Dan Xu1, Kevin F. King2, Yudong Zhu3, Graeme McKinnon2, Zhi-Pei Liang1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; 3General Electric Corporate R&D Center, Niskayuna, New York, USA
1697. Design of Linear Class Large-Tip-Angle Multidimensional RF Pulses for Parallel Transmit Dan Xu1, Kevin F. King2, Yudong Zhu3, Graeme McKinnon2, Zhi-Pei Liang1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA; 3General Electric Corporate R&D Center, Niskayuna, New York, USA
1698. Pulse Design Methods for Reduction of Specific Absorption Rate in Parallel RF Excitation Adam Charles Zelinski1, Kawin Setsompop1, Vijayanand Alagappan2, Borjan Alexsandar Gagoski1, Leonardo M. Angelone2, Giorgio Bonmassar2, Ulrich Fontius3, Franz Schmitt3, Elfar Adalsteinsson1, Lawrence L. Wald1, 2 1MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 3Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany
1699. Designing RF Pulses with Optimal Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Characteristics and Exploring Excitation Fidelity, SAR and Pulse Duration Tradeoffs Adam Charles Zelinski1, Vivek K. Goyal1, Leonardo Angelone2, Giorgio Bonmassar2, Lawrence L. Wald1, 2, Elfar Adalsteinsson1 1MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2A. A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1700. Reducing B1 Inhomogeneity Using Optimized Parallel Transmit Pulses Dan Xu1, Kevin F. King2, Graeme McKinnon2, Zhi-Pei Liang1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
1701. k-Space Sample Density Compensation Via Basis Function Cross-Correlations, with Application to the Design of 2D RF Excitations Dimitris Mitsouras1, Robert V. Mulkern, 12, Onur Afacan3, Dana H. Brooks3, Frank J. Rybicki1 1Brigham And Womens Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Childrens Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 3Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1702. Design of Refocusing Flip Angle Modulation for Volumetric 3D-FSE Imaging of Brain, Spine, Knee, Kidney and Uterus Reed F. Busse1, Anja C S Brau2, Philip J. Beatty2, Jean H. Brittain1, Ling Sun3, Hari Hariharan3, Garry A. Gold4, Howard A. Rowley5, Elizabeth A. Sadowski5, Scott B. Reeder5 1GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA; 3GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA; 4Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 5University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1703. 3D Spatial Excitation Using Variable-Density K-Space Trajectories Patrick Wilhelm1, Peter Börnert2, Kay Nehrke2 1University of Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany; 2Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany
1704. Enhanced Diffusion Weighting Generated by Selective Composite Adiabatic Pulses Ziqi Sun1, 2, Robert Bartha1, 3 1Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada; 2The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; 3University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
1705. Selective Rotation Pulses Calculated with an Inverse Scattering Algorithm Christian Oliver Bretschneider1, David Edward Rourke1 1University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK
1706. High Performance Computation of Spatially Selective Excitation Pulses Regarding Realistic Experimental Conditions Tony Stöcker1, N. Jon Shah1 1Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
1707. Feedback-Enhanced MRI by Fixed-Point Dynamics and Nonlinear Spin-Locking Jon Furuyama1, YUNG-YA LIN1 1UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA
1708. Design of Linear-Phase Frequency-Modulated Broadband Refocusing Pulses Rolf F. Schulte1, Patrick Le Roux2, Mika W. Vogel1, Hartmut Koenig1 1GE Global Research, Munich, Germany; 2GE Healthcare, Palaiseau, France
1709. Novel Design for Notched RF Saturation Pulses Using the SLR Transform Charles H. Cunningham1, Michael Lustig2, Bob S. Hu2, Juan M. Santos2, Taehoon Shin3, Krishna S. Nayak3, John M. Pauly2 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Stanford, Stanford, California, USA; 3University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1710. Towards MRSI of the Prostate at 7T Using Adiabatic RF Pulses and a Transmit and Receive Endorectal Coil Dennis Klomp1, 2, Tom Scheenen1, Arend Heerschap1 1Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 2International Research Center for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Cognitive Science, Essen, Germany
1711. Inverted Double Half RF Pulse for Long T2 Suppression in Ultrashort Echo-Time Imaging Sonal Josan1, John Pauly1, Kim Butts Pauly1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1712. Variable Slew Rate Spiral Design for Local SAR Reduction in 2D RF Pulse Design Dan Xu1, Kevin F. King2, Zhi-Pei Liang1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA; 2General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1713. Fast T1ρ Measurements by Spin-Lock Pre-Encoded HASTE and bSSFP (SLIPS) Eric Albert Mellon1, Sampreet Niyogi1, Mallikarjunarao Kasam1, Reddy Shashank Beesam1, Walter Witschey1, Arijitt Borthakur1, Ravinder Reddy1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1714. T1ρ MRI of the Human Brain Using a Spin-Locked SSFP Pulse Sequence Ari Borthakur1, Sampreet Niyogi1, Walter Witschey1, Chenyang Wang1, Elias R. Melhem1, Ravinder Reddy1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1715. MP-RAGE Techniques for Imaging the Mouse Abdomen at 9.4T Nirav J. Mehta1, Amy H. Herlihy2, Li-Wen Li2, Po-Wah So2, Jimmy D. Bell2 1Imperial College London, London, UK; 2Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
1716. Signal and Contrast Properties of Very-Long Spin-Echo Trains for 3D T2-Weighted Turbo-Spin-Echo Imaging John P. Mugler, III1 1University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
1717. T1-Optimized Single-Slab 3D Turbo Spin Echo Imaging with Long Echo Trains Jaeseok Park1, John P. Mugler III2, Wilhelm Horger1, Berthold Kiefer1 1Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany; 2University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
1718. Different Distribution Functions of Magnetization Transfer Pulses for High Resolution MT Imaging of the Knee at 3 Tesla Petros Martirosian1, Andreas Boss1, Hansjoerg Graf1, Michael Deimling2, Berthold Kiefer2, Fritz Schick1 1University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany; 2Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany
1719. Simultaneous T1, T2 and Spin Density Quantification in 5 Seconds Using Inversion Recovery SSFP Christian Stehning1, Stefanie Winkelmann1, Hannes Dahnke1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany
1720. Effects of T1, T2, and Spectral Complexity on In- And Out-Of-Phase Imaging: A Systematic Approach by Computer Simulation Takeshi Yokoo1, Mark Bydder1, Jason Barksdale2, Gavin Hamilton1, Michael Middleton1, Claude Sirlin1, Graeme Bydder1 1University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California, USA; 2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1721. Applications of Off-Resonance Positive Contrast Imaging Using FLAPS Rohan Dharmakumar1, Ioannis Koktzoglou1, Tatjana Paunesku1, Gayle E. Woloschak1, Debiao Li1 1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1722. Dependency of Parameter Estimates for the Tofts Model on Temporal Sampling Rate and on Bolus Arrival Time Hendrik Oliver Arp Laue1, Matthias Althaus1, Sarah Behrens1, Horst Karl Hahn1, Heinz-Otto Peitgen1 1Mevis Research, Bremen, Germany
1723. Towards Whole Brain Myelin Imaging Burkhard Mädler1, 2, Alex L. MacKay2 1Philips Medical Systems Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada; 2UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
1724. Modeling Pulsed Magnetization Transfer Sharon Portnoy1, Greg Jan Stanisz2 1Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Sunnybrook HSC, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1725. Turbo PROPELLER with Asymmetric Blade Donglai Huo1, Ryan G. Robison1, Nick R. Zwart1, Josef P. Debbins1, Alan Thompson2, James G. Pipe1 1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
1726. Anisotropic Field-Of-Views for PROPELLER MRI Peder E. Z. Larson1, Dwight G. Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1727. System Characterization for VP-PROPELLER MRA Nicholas R. Zwart1, James G. Pipe1 1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
1728. T1-Weighted PROPELLER GRE Using Inversion Recovery (IR) Naoyuki Takei1, Tetsuji Tsukamoto1 1GE Yokogawa Medical Systems, Ltd, Hino, Japan
1729. Golden Angle PROPELLER MRI Kay Nehrke1, Peter Börnert1, Gert H. van Yperen2, Holger Eggers1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands
1730. TBLADE-Spatiotemporal PROPELLER MRI Alto Stemmer1, Michaela Schmidt1, Berthold Kiefer1 1Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany
1731. Analysis and Refinement of PROPELLER MRI Motion Correction Ryan K. Robison1, James G. Pipe1 1Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
1732. Motion Estimation for PROPELLER MRI Using Image-Based Registration Kay Nehrke1, Brian Welch2, Peter Börnert1, Holger Eggers1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, USA
1733. Corrections to Accelerated Propeller Acquisition to Maintain Contrast and Reduce T2 Decay Artifacts Shaorong Chang1, Ajeetkumar Gaddipati1, Ersin Bayram1, Michael R. Hartley1 1GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA
1734. GRAPPA Estimations Using Undersampled Propeller Trajectories Stefan Skare1, Rexford D. Newbould1, Roland Bammer1 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
1735. Preserving Phase Information in Propeller Imaging Holger Eggers1, Gert H. van Yperen2 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands
1736. Further Investigation on the SNR and De-Blurring Effect of the Weighting Window on PROPELLER EPI Reconstruction Fu-Nien Wang1, Tzu-Chao Chuang2, Teng-Yi Huang3, Nan-Kuei Chen4, Hsiao-Wen Chung2, Kenneth K. Kwong5 1National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 3National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; 4Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 5Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
1737. Contrast Optimization by Data Weighting in Propeller Imaging Holger Eggers1, Gert H. van Yperen2, Kay Nehrke1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands
1738. PROPELLER Reconstruction Using Discrete Fourier Interpolation Kay Nehrke1, Peter Börnert1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany
1739. Analytical Sampling Density Compensation for PROPELLER MRI Kay Nehrke1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1740. Parallel Imaging as a Non-Linear Inversion Problem - Improved Reconstructions Martin Uecker1, Kai Tobias Block1, Jens Frahm1 1Biomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, Goettingen, Germany
1741. B0-Correction in Parallel Imaging with Arbitrary K-Space Trajectories Rolf F. Schulte1, Florian Wiesinger1, Hartmut Koenig1 1GE Global Research, Munich, Germany
1742. Fully Autocalibrated Parallel Imaging for Arbitrary Trajectories Using a Combination of GRAPPA-Operator Gridding and Conjugate-Gradient Optimization Nicole Seiberlich1, Felix A. Breuer2, Hisamoto Moriguchi3, Peter M. Jakob1, 2, Mark A. Griswold4 1University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; 2Research Center Magnetic Resonance Bavaria (MRB), Würzburg, Germany; 3Toho University Omori Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan; 4University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1743. Continuous 2D GRAPPA Kernel for Propeller Trajectories Stefan Skare1, Rexford Newbould1, Roland Bammer1 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
1744. Iterative GRAPPA (iGRAPPA) for Improved Parallel Imaging Reconstruction Tiejun Zhao1, Xiaoping Hu1 1Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
1745. Iterative Back-Projection Reconstruction for Radial SENSE Peng Qu1, Bing Wu1, Chunsheng Wang1, Jing Yuan1, Juan Wei1, Yong Pang1, Gary X. Shen1 1The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
1746. SNR Variation with Regularization Term for Non-Cartesian SENSE Reconstruction Joanna E. Perthen1, Mark Bydder1, Thomas T. Liu1 1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
1747. Universal Approach to Quantification of SNR and G-Factor for Parallel MRI Philip M. Robson1, Aaron K. Grant1, Ananth J. Madhuranthakam2, Riccardo Lattanzi1, 3, Daniel K. Sodickson1, Charles A. McKenzie1 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Global Applied Sciences Lab., GE Healthcare, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 3Harvard-MIT, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1748. Global 2D Polynomial Fit Method for Efficient Filling of Coil Sensitivity Profile Gaps Christopher Joseph Wargo1, Malcolm J. Avison1, John C. Gore1 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1749. A Method for Autocalibrating 2-D Accelerated Volumetric Parallel Imaging with Clinically Practical Reconstruction Times Philip James Beatty1, Anja C. Brau1, Shaorong Chang2, Sanjay M. Joshi2, Charles R. Michelich2, Ersin Bayram2, Teresa E. Nelson3, Robert J. Herfkens3, Jean H. Brittain4 1GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA; 3Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 4GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1750. Introducing Auto-Calibrated Parallel Imaging GRAPPA to 3D Axial Continuously Moving Table Whole-Body MRI Michael O. Zenge1, Mark E. Ladd1, Harald H. Quick1 1University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
1751. Uniform Virtual Coil Reconstruction for Autocalibrating Parallel Imaging Philip James Beatty1, Anja C. Brau1 1GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA
1752. Point Spread Functions in K-Space and Image-Based Parallel Image Reconstructions Philip M. Robson1, Charles A. McKenzie1, Aaron K. Grant1 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1753. Increasing Efficiency of Parallel Imaging by Using Information from Spatially Adjacent Slices Matthias Honal1, Hans-Peter Fautz2, Ute Ludwig1, Maxim Zaitsev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2General Electric, Garching, Germany
1754. 3D Cartesian and Elliptical GRAPPA Based Spectroscopic Imaging of Gliomas at 3 Tesla Suchandrima Banerjee1, 2, Esin Ozturk-Isik1, 2, Sharmila Majumdar1, 2, Sarah J. Nelson1, 2 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; 2University of California San Francisco-University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
1755. Proton-Echo-Planar-Spectroscopic-Imaging (PEPSI) on the Human Brain Using a 32-Channel Coil Array and GRAPPA Reconstructions at 3T Shang-Yueh Tsai1, Stefan Posse2, 3, Ricardo Otazo3, Yi-Ru Lin4, Hsiao-Wen Chung1, Fa-Hsuan Lin5, 6 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; 3University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; 4National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; 5MGH-HMS-MIT Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 6Massachusetts General Hospita, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1756. Edge Preserving Bayesian Reconstruction Method for Parallel Imaging and Application in Cadiac MRI Gurmeet Singh1, Bryan Kressler1, Thanh Nguyen2, Pascal Spincemaille2, Ramin Zabih1, Ashish Raj3, Yi Wang2 1Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA; 2Cornell University, New York, USA; 3UC San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
1757. Tikhonov Regularization Optimisation for PreLearn: Effects on the Detection of Activations in Functional MRI Alejandro Ribés1, 2, Cécile Rabrait1, Ching-Po Lin3, Franck Lethimonnier1, Denis Le Bihan1, Cyril Poupon1 1Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Paris, France; 2National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; 3National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
1758. Methods for Robust Quantification of Trabecular Bone Parameters from Highly Accelerated In Vivo MR Images Obtained by GRAPPA Based Techniques at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla Suchandrima Banerjee1, 2, Sharmila Majumdar1, 2 1University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; 2University of California San Francisco-University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
1759. Parallel Imaging of Mice on a Clinical 3-Tesla MRI System with a Dedicated 8-Channel Small-Animal Coil Array Olaf Dietrich1, Titus Lanz2, Herbert M. Reinl1, Frank Berger1, Michael Peller1, Maximilian F. Reiser1, Stefan O. Schoenberg1 1Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany; 2RAPID Biomedical, Rimpar, Germany
1760. Intrinsic Signal Amplification in 2D SENSE Elliptical Centric 3D Contrast-Enhanced MRA Stephen J. Riederer1, Houchun H. Hu2, Clifton R. Haider1, Norbert G. Campeau1, John Huston1 1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; 2University of Southern California,
1761. Benefit of Parallel Imaging Techniques for Silent EPI Sebastian Schmitter1, Michael Amann2, Lothar Rudi Schad1 1German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Universitaetsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
1762. Application of 2D-SENSE to 3D MP-RAGE with Elliptical-Centric Phase-Encoding Ek T. Tan1, Clifton R. Haider1, Roger C. Grimm1, Houchun H. Hu2, Stephen J. Riederer1 1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; 2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
Methods for CEST, Susceptibility and MREIT Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1763. Sub-Millimolar PARACEST Detection Using EPI-CEST Craig Kenneth Jones1, Robert Bartha1, 2, Ravi S. Menon1, 2 1Robarts Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada; 2University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
1764. Analytical Description of WALTZ-PARACEST Experiments Elena Vinogradov1, Huamei He2, Angelo Lubag3, James A. Balschi2, A Dean Sherry3, 4, Robert E. Lenkinski1 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Brigham and Woman’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 3University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; 4University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA
1765. Fast Two-Point Mapping of the Bound Pool Fraction and Cross-Relaxation Rate Constant in the Human Brain Vasily L. Yarnykh1 1University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
1766. Fast Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (SWI) with an Echo-Shifted FLASH Sequence Jochen Leupold1, Kai Zhong1, Oliver Speck1, 2 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
1767. Probing T1- And Off-Resonance-Based Signal Enhancements with Gd-DTPA Using Fast Low Angle Positive Contrast Steady-State Free Precession Imaging Nicole Mascheri1, Ioannis Koktzoglou1, Debiao Li1, Rohan Dharmakumar1 1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1768. Quantitative Mapping of Susceptibility Gradients from Regular Gradient Echo Images and First Application at 7T Hannes Dahnke1, Tobias Schaeffter2, Stefanie Winkelmann1, Richard Bowtell3, Peter Börnert1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2King's College, London, UK; 3University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
1769. Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging of Brain Tumor Patients at 7T Using an Autocalibrating Parallel Technique Janine M. Lupo1, Suchandrima Banerjee1, Kathryn E. Hammond1, Douglas A C Kelley2, Duan Xu1, Susan M. Chang1, Daniel B. Vigneron1, Sharmila Majumdar1, Sarah J. Nelson1 1University of California, San Francisco, California, USA; 2GE Healthcare, San Francisco, California, USA
1770. Improved Vessel Localization in Magnetic Resonance Venography at 3T Using Multiple-Echo Image Combination and Asymmetric Triangular Filter Valentina Brainovich1, Gisela E. Hagberg1 1Neuroimaging Laboratory, Rome, Italy
1771. Mutual Information Based MREIT Reconstruction Using MR Anatomical Data Gang Chen1, Lutfi Tugan Muftuler1, Ozlem Birgul1, Mark Jason Hamamura1, Orhan Nalcioglu1 1Tu & Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
1772. Effects of Limited Volume Coverage on Accuracy of MR-Electrical Impedance Tomography L Tugan Muftuler1, Ozlem Birgul1, Mark Jason Hamamura1, Orhan Nalcioglu1 1University of California, Irvine, California, USA
1773. Fast Imaging for Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography Mark Jason Hamamura1, Lufti Tugan Muftuler1, Ozlem Birgul1, Orhan Nalcioglu1 1University of California, Irvine, California, USA
1774. In Vivo Determination of Electric Conductivity and Permittivity Using "Electric Properties Tomography" (EPT) Ulrich Katscher1, Torsten Dorniok2, Christian Findeklee1, Peter Vernickel1 1Philips Research Laboratories, Hamburg, Germany; 2Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
1775. 3D Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography at 4T Using Sensivity Matrix Based Reconstruction Ozlem Birgul1, L Tugan Muftuler1, Mark J. Hamamura1, Orhan Nalcioglu1 1University of California, Irvine, California, USA
1776. Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Electrical Impedance Tomography at 4T and 7T Field Strengths Ozlem Birgul1, Mark J. Hamamura1, L Tugan Muftuler1, Orhan Nalcioglu1 1University of California, Irvine, California, USA
1777. Imaging Weak Currents by Means of Balanced SSFP Giedrius Buracas1, Thomas T. Liu1, Lawrence R. Frank1, Eric C. Wong1 1UCSD, La Jolla, California, USA
1778. Iterative Fourier Transform Magnetic Resonance Current Density Imaging (FT-MR-CDI) Yusuf Ziya Ider1, Orhan Arikan1 1Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey
Relaxation Time Mapping & Relaxometry Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1779. Exploring Transverse Relaxation Mechanisms by Simulation at the Nano Scale: Introduction of a High Speed Monte Carlo Algorithm Xiangyu Yang1, Petra Schmalbrock1, Michael Boss1, Bradley Clymer1, Georgeta Mihai1, Michael V. Knopp1 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
1780. Role of Magnetic ‘Structure’ in Determining In Vivo Relaxivity-Iron Behavior: Size Does Matter Nilesh R. Ghugre1, John C. Wood1 1Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1781. R2* Quantitation Reveals That Serum Ferritin Is an Unreliable Surrogate for Tissue Iron Concentration in Myocardium and Liver James E. Siebert1, Mark C. DeLano1, Matthew T. Latourette1, Kenneth A. Schwartz1, Ganapathy S. Krishnan1, Muhammad K. Siddique1 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
1782. Dealing with Spatially Varying Noise in T2* Mapping with SENSE Julien Sénégas1, Tobias Knopp2, Hannes Dahnke1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2University Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
1783. Transverse Relaxation Time (T2) and Susceptibility Measurement with Phase-Cycled Steady-State Free Precession Sean CL Deoni1, 2 1Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Oxford, England, UK; 2Institute of Psychiatry, London, England, UK
1784. Noise Dependence of T2* Maps on Echo Times and Number of Echoes Ravi Teja Seethamraju1, John Kirsch1, Alex Guimaraes2, Franz Hebrank1, Martin Requardt3, Ralph Weissleder2, Mukesh Harisinghani2 1Siemens Medical Solutions, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 2Masscahusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 3Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany
1785. Accelerated R2 Mapping Through Undersampling and k-T Reconstruction Julien Sénégas1, Hannes Dahnke1 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany
1786. Ultradense Sampling of FID and SE Signals Using an Interleaved Multiple Gradient Echo Sequence for Improved T2* Mapping Peter Roland Seevinck1, Jan-Henry Seppenwoolde1, Jaco Zwanenburg1, Chris J. Bakker1 1University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands
1787. Rapid Simultaneous Data Acquisition of T1 and T2 Mapping, Using Multishot EPI and Automated Variations of TR and TE at 3T Xin Liu1, Yi Feng1, Zheng-Rong Lu1, Eun-Kee Jeong1 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
1788. 3D Relaxomic Analysis of a Tumor Laden Mouse Brain Tuhin Kumar Sinha1, Sheerin Khatib-Shahidi1, Thomas Yankeelov1, Dale Shannon Cornett1, Khubaib Mapara1, Moneeb M. Ehtesham, Benoit M. Dawant1, Richard M. Caprioli1, John C. Gore1 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1789. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tomato Fruit Maja Musse1, Stéphane Quellec1, Marie Françoise Devaux2, Marc Lahaye2, François Mariette1 1Cemagref, Rennes, France; 2INRA, Nantes, France
1790. Mixed-TSE with Reduced Flip Angle TSE Readouts: Quantitative MRI Accuracy and SNR Vs. Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Ryan Patrick Irving1, Osamu Sakai2, Hernan Jara3 1Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Boston University Medical Center, Massachusetts, USA; 3Boston Unversity, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1791. A Free-Breathing Self-Gated 3D Golden-Angle Radial Technique for Abdominal Imaging and T1 Mapping Wei Lin1, Ruitian Song1, Mark Rosen1, Hee Kwon Song1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1792. Rapid Dynamic 3D T1-Mapping of the Abdomen Dingxin Wang1, Sumeet Virmani1, Ioannis Koktzoglou1, Mary Mulcahy1, Reed Omary1, Andrew Larson1 1Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
1793. Intrinsic Accuracy of Myocardial T1 Quantification with Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery (MOLLI) Andreas Greiser1, Daniel Messroghli2, Edgar Mueller1 1Siemens AG Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany; 2Franz-Volhard-Klinik, Charité, Universitätmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
1794. An Optimal Framework for T1 Estimation in an SPGR Acquisition Cheng Guan Koay1, Lin-Ching Chang1, Sean Deoni2, Carlo Pierpaoli1 1NICHD, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
1795. Surpassing Square-Root of Imaging Time Accuracy Gain in T1 Estimation Using SPGR Sequence Lazar Fleysher1, Roman Fleysher1, Songtao Liu1, Wafaa Zaaraoui1, Oded Gonen1 1NYU School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
1796. Effect of the Phase Increment on the Accuracy of T1 Measurements by the Variable Flip Angle Method Using a Fast RF Spoiled Gradient Echo Sequence Vasily L. Yarnykh1 1University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
1797. Accurate and Precise T1 Relaxometry with Reduced Data Acquisition Requirements Warren D. Foltz1, Venkat Ramanan2, Charles H. Cunningham2, Duncan J. Stewart1, Graham A. Wright2, Alexander J. Dick2 1St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1798. Fast T1-Mapping to Study Biodistribution of Nanoparticulate Contrast Agents Christian Kremser1, Maria Stollenwerk1, Christian Wolf1, Florian Föger2, Karin Albrecht2, Heribert Talasz1, Hermann Dietrich1, Werner Jaschke1, Paul Debbage1 1Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; 2Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
1799. Measurements of T2 Relaxation of J-Coupled Metabolites in the Human Brain at 4 Tesla Dinesh K. Deelchand1, M. Marjanska1, K. Ugurbil1, Pierre-Gilles Henry1 1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
1800. How Much of the Reported Myelin Water Component in T2 Decays Is Actually a Reconstruction Artifact of the Main Water Peak? Keith Sean Cover1 1UV University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands
1801. Variable Echo Time Imaging and Signal Characteristics of 1-M Gadobutrol Contrast Agent at 1.5 and 3T Aurélien F. Stalder1, Jürgen Hennig1, Michael Markl1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
1802. T1ρ Imaging with Weak B1 Fields in the Presence of Frequency Offsets Stephen Pickup1, Weixia Liu1, Sungheon Kim1, Harish Poptani1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1803. Artifacts in T1ρ-Weighted Imaging: Compensation for B0 and B1 Field Imperfections Walter R.T. Witschey1, Arijitt Borthakur1, Mark A. Elliott1, Sampreet Niyogi, Chenyang Wang, Daniel J. Wallman, Ravinder Reddy1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1804. Correction for Image Artifacts in T1ρ off-Weighted Imaging Walter R.T. Witschey1, Arijitt Borthakur1, Mark A. Elliott1, Sampreet Niyogi, Chenyang Wang, Daniel J. Wallman, Ravinder Reddy1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1805. Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Relaxation Imaging Nikola Stikov1, Tolga Cukur1, Robert F. Dougherty1, Brian A. Wandell1, John Mark Pauly1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1806. Stimulated Echo Prepared Balanced SSFP with Variable T2* and T1 Contrast Florian Fidler1, Peter Michael Jakob1, 2 1MRB Research Center for Magnetic Resonance Bavaria, Würzburg, Germany; 2University of Würzburg
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1807. Correction of Macroscopic Field Gradient Effect for Magnetic Field Correlation Imaging Kamila Urszula Szulc1, Jens H. Jensen1, Hanzhang Lu1, 2, Liang Xuan1, Cathy Hu1, Anita Ramani1, Maria Fatima Falangola1, 3, Joseph A. Helpern1, 3 1New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA; 2University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA; 3Nathan S. Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York, USA
1808. Multiple Narrow-Band Excitations Spiral Imaging Michael Lustig1, Charlse Henry Cunningham2, Bob Hu3, John Mark Pauly1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 3Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Palo Alto, California, USA
1809. Automatic Calculation of Gradient Delays for Center-Out Radial Trajectories Using an Entropy Metric Mark Bydder1, Takeshi Yokoo1, Jiang Du1 1University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
1810. A Simple Method for Measuring and Removing Susceptibility Artifacts Charles L. Epstein1, Jeremy F. Magland2 1U of PA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 2Hospital of U of PA, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1811. Chemical Shift Artifact in Center-Out Radial Sampling: A Potential Pitfall in Clinical Diagnosis Mark Bydder1, Jiang Du1, Atsushi Takahashi2, Ann Shimakawa2, Gavin Hamilton1, Shantanu Sinha1, Graeme M. Bydder1 1University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA
1812. Improved B0 Field Mapping with an Interleaved SE/ASE Acquisition and a Multi-Channel Receive Coil David J. Lythgoe1, Gareth J. Barker1 1Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
1813. Intensity Correction Using Eigen Modes of Channels Sathya Vijayakumar1, Yu Li1, Charles Albert Saylor1, Feng Huang1, George Randall Duensing1 1Invivo Corporation, Gainesville, Florida, USA
1814. Removing Gradient Non-Linearity Effects in Deformation Morphometry of High Field Serial MRI Colin Studholme1, 2, Lara Stables2, Michael Weiner1, 2 1U.C.S.F., San Francisco, California, USA; 2NCIRE, VAMC, San Francisco, California, USA
1815. Stability Evaluation of Geometric Distortion Correction in Multi-Station Whole-Body MR Imaging Yo Taniguchi1, Hisako Nagao2, Takayuki Abe2, Tetsuhiko Takahashi2, Hisaaki Ochi1 1Hitachi, Ltd., Kokubunji, Tokyo, Japan; 2Hitachi Medical Corporation, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
1816. Model Independent Correction of Complex Intensity Inhomogeneities Rudolf Stollberger1, 2, Herman Toplak1, Johann Raith1, Hermann Scharfetter2 1Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; 2Graz University of Technology, Graz, Austria
1817. Impact of Geometric Distortions on 3T fMRI Retinotopic Maps Flor Vasseur1, 2, Chantal Delon-Martin1, 2, Jan Warnking1, 2, Christoph Segebarth1, 2, Michel Dojat1, 2 1INSERM, Grenoble, France; 2Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France
1818. The Impact of Magnetisation Transfer Effects on Inversion-Recovery Sequences Using a Fast Spin-Echo Readout Simon J. P. Meara1, Gareth John Barker2 1University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; 2Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
1819. Comparison of 3D FSE-XETA with 3D FIESTA-C and 3D FRFSE for Imaging of the Internal Auditory Canal at 3T Heidi A. Ward1, Reed F. Busse2, David W. Stanley2, Timothy J. Kaufmann1, John I. Lane1, Robert J. Witte1 1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; 2GE Healthcare, USA
1820. Suppression of Residual Transverse Magnetisation in SPI Sequences Using Phase Cycling Filter Joachim Bernhard M. Kaffanke1, Tony Stoecker1, Sandro Romanzetti1, Thomas Dierkes1, Nadim Jon Shah1 1Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany
1821. Retrospective Adaptive K-Space Filtering for Improved Image Quality in Hyperpolarized Gas MRI Kevin J. Cooper1, Kuan J. Lee1, Kevin Teh1, Jim M. Wild1 1University of Sheffield, Sheffield, Yorkshire, UK
1822. Assessment of the Separability of Physiologic Noise Using Spatial ICA Erik Bryan Beall1, Mark Joseph Lowe1 1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1823. A Robust Spike Noise Correction Method for fMRI sofia Chavez1, fred Tam1, 2, Simon Graham1, 2 1Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Rotman Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1824. Activation Signal Recovery in fMRI Using an Efficient Signal Drop-Out Correction Method Helen Marshall1, Jane E. Warren1, M Alex Dresner1, Richard J. S. Wise1, David J. Larkman1, Jo V. Hajnal1 1Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK
1825. Combined Correction with Regression for Measured Respiratory, Cardiac, and Capnometry Variations in Pain FMRI Studies Improves Model Fit Keith Michael Vogt1, James W. Ibinson, 12, Robert H. Small1, Petra Schmalbrock1 1The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA; 2University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvannia, USA
1826. Quantitative Study of Motion Detection Performance of Center-Of-Kspace Measurements Pascal Spincemaille1, Thanh Dang Nguyen1, Martin R. Prince1, Yi Wang1 1Weill Medicall College of Cornell University, New York, New York, USA
1827. Motion Correction Technique for Segmented Acquisition Using Parallel Imaging Reconstruction and Image Based Correlation Maggie M. Fung1, Thomas K. Foo2 1GE Healthcare, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York, USA
1828. Prospective Head Movement Correction for High Resolution MRI Using an In-Bore Optical Tracking System Lei Qin1, 2, Peter van Gelderen1, Fenghua Jin2, Yang Tao2, Jeff H. Duyn1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
1829. Prospective Motion Correction Using Nonlinear Predictive Filtering Nathan S. White1, Ajit Shankaranarayanan2, Eric T. Han3, Ajeetkumar Gaddipati4, Copper Roddey, Anders M. Dale 1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Baltimore, Maryland; 3GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California; 4GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin
1830. A Level-Set Approach to Joint Nonlinear Registration and Segmentation Using Fast Numerical Scheme Peter Zhilkin1, Murray E. Alexander1 1National Research Council Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
1831. A Correction Method of Streak Artifacts in Gradient-Echo EPI Sequence Using a Spin Echo EPI Reference Jun-Young Chung1, Yeji Han1, HyunWook Park1 1KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1832. Reference-Less EPI Ghost Correction in Real-Time Cardiac MRI Jon-Fredrik Nielsen1, Yoon-Chul Kim1, Krishna S. Nayak1 1University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
1833. Major Speed-Up of Nyquist Ghost Correction in Ramp-Sampled EPI Anders Nordell1, 2, Roland Bammer1, Stefan Skare1 1Lucas MRI/S Center, Stanford, Palo Alto, California, USA; 2Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
1834. Image Based Ghost Correction for Oblique Imaging Anders Nordell1, 2, Roland Bammer1, Stefan Skare1 1Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA; 2Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
1835. Correction for Gradient-Echo EPI Distortions Using Embedded Low-Resolution Field Mapping and K-Space Energy Spectrum Analysis Su-Chin Chiu1, Teng-Yi Huang2, Hsiao-Wen Chung1, Nan-kuei Chen3 1National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; 2National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan; 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1836. Distortion Reduction in EPI Based on Minimal Field of View Sharon Peled1, 2, Stephen Whalen, Alexandra J. Golby, 2 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
1837. Gaussian Process Modeling for EPI Distortion Correction Joseph William Stevick1, Sally G. Harding2, Ulrich Paquet2, Richard Ansorge2, Adrian Carpenter2, Guy Williams2 1University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; 2University of Cambridge, UK
1838. Using Genetic Algorithm (GA) to Improve Gradient-Reversal Method for Susceptibility Distortion Correction Xiaoxu Liu1, Jianhui Zhong1 1University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
1839. Analysis of Streak Artifacts in Gradient-Echo EPI Sequence Using 1.5T MRI System Jun-Young Chung1, Yeji Han1, HyunWook Park1 1KAIST, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
1840. Estimation of Eddy Current Induced Phase Error in EPI Guoxiang Liu1 1National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Kobe, Hyougo, Japan
1841. Digital Tuning to Suppress Ghost Artifacts in EPI by Minimization of Total Variation Frank Q. Ye1, Qing-San Xiang2 1National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
1842. FRED-GMC: Filtering of Raw EPI Data for Gradient Map Calculations Frederik Testud1, Oliver Speck1, 2, Jürgen Hennig1, Maxim Zaitsev1 1University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; 2Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
1843. Investigation of Distortion-Correction Procedures for a Double Inversion-Recovery Sequence with an Echo-Planar Imaging Readout Simon J. P. Meara1, Karl V. Embleton1, Geoff J. M. Parker1 1University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
1844. A Method to Correct Linear Eddy Currents by K-Space Trajectory Estimation Chao Ma1 1Tsinghua University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
1845. Physical Model of Weiskoff EPI Temporal Stability Test Alan Seth Barnett1, Jerzy Bodurka1 1National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1846. A New Dimensional Estimation Method for Group fMRI Data Reduction at Multiple Levels Charon Chen1, Keh-Shih Chuang2, Thomas J. Ross1, Yihong Yang1, Wang Zhan1 1National Institute on Drug Abuse, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2National Tsing-Hua University, Hsin Chu, Taiwan
1847. Modulation of the Inverse Functional Relation of Resting and Working Memory Networks David Matthew Carpenter1, Eric Leung1, Johnny Ng1, Cheuk Y. Tang1 1Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
1848. Functional Connectivity Measured with Mutual Information at 7 Tesla Allen T. Newton1, John C. Gore1, Baxter P. Rogers1, Christopher J. Gatenby1, Victoria L. Morgan1 1Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
1849. A Method for Detecting 'Meaningful' Components in Independent Component Analyses of fMRI Data Weiming Zeng1, 2, BettyAnn A. Chodkowski1, James J. Pekar1, 2 1Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
1850. The Application of Consistency Constraint in Sliding Window Functional MRI Analysis Epifanio Bagarinao1, Kayako Matsuo2, Toshiharu Nakai2, Yoshio Tanaka1 1National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki, Japan; 2National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Aichi, Japan
1851. Multivariate Methods for Discrimination in the Analysis of fMRI Data William S. Rayens1, Yushu Liu1, Anders H. Andersen1, Charles D. Smith1 1University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
1852. Recurrence Quantification Analysis: A Model-Free Analytical Method for Cerebral fMRI Data Marta Bianciardi1, Paolo Sirabella2, Gisela Elizabeth Hagberg1, Alessandro Giuliani3, Joseph P. Zbilut4, Alfredo Colosimo5 1Foundation Santa Lucia, IRCCS, Rome, Italy; 2University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy; 3Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy; 4Rush College of Medicine, Chicago, USA; 5, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
1853. Evaluating Strategies to Deal with Motion in fMRI Using Independent Component Analysis Anthony B. Waites1, Mikael Peterson, 12, David F. Abbott1, Graeme D. Jackson1 1Brain Research Institute, Heidelberg West, Vic, Australia; 2University of Lund, Lund, Sweden
1854. Retrospective Quality Assessment of fMRI Data Mark A. Elliott1, Daniel Y. Kimberg1, Geoffrey K. Aguirre1, John A. Detre1 1University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1855. Test-Retest Reliability of Functional MRI Using Smart Phantom: Analysis II Qun Zhao1, Tim Conway2, 3, Keith White2, 3, Keith McGregor2, 3, Anastasia Ford2, 3, Bruce Crosson2, 3 1University of Georgia, Athens, GA., USA; 2University of Florida, Gainesville, FL., USA; 3VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL.
1856. Sensitivity of Random Effects Analyses to Group Size and Individual Outliers: A Jackknife Study Pradeep C. Venkat1, Tom Johnstone2, Andrew L. Alexander1, 2, Terrence R. Oakes2 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 2Waisman Center for Brain Imaging and Behavior, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1857. Power Calculation for fMRI Data Analysis with Non-Central Random Field Theory Satoru Hayasaka1, Ann Peiffer1, Christina Hugenschmidt1, Paul Laurienti1 1Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
1858. A Fractal Dimension for Exploratory fMRI Analysis Klaus Rudolf Hahn1, Sergei Prigarin2, Karsten Rodenacker1, Konrad Sandau3 1gsf-National Research Center for Environment & Health, Neuherberg, Bavaria, Germany; 2Institute Computational Mathematics, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; 3University of Applied Sciences, Darmstadt, Germany
1859. Iterative Segmentation Optimization for Model-Based Detection of fMRI Activation Liang Liu1, Thomas Talavage1 1Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
1860. Spatial Normalization of fMRI Results Using Study-Based EPI and T1-Weighted Brain Templates Yuan-Yu Hsu1, Chih-Mao Huang, 12, Wan-Chun Kuan2, 3, Hsin-Mei Chen2, 3, Yau-Yau Wai2, 3, Yung-Liang Wan2, 3, Ho-Ling Liu2, 3 1Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; 2Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; 3Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
1861. Effective T1 Based Intensity Compensation of Spin Saturation Effect Due to Out-Of-Slice Head Motion in fMRI Time Series Obtained Via the MSV Motion Correction Algorithm Roshni Bhagalia1, Boklye Kim2 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; 2University of Michigan, Michigan
1862. Accurate Estimation of Physiologic Noise Using Temporal ICA-Derived Spatial Measures Erik Bryan Beall1, Mark Joseph Lowe1 1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1863. Calibrated-BOLD fMRI: The Effect of the BOLD Post-Stimulus Undershoot on the Calculation of the Flow/metabolism Coupling Ratio Joanna E. Perthen1, Oleg Leontiev1, Richard B. Buxton1 1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
1864. Caffeine Induced Uncoupling of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism: A Calibrated-BOLD Study Joanna E. Perthen1, Amy E. Lansing1, Beau M. Ances1, Joy Liau1, Thomas T. Liu1, Richard B. Buxton1 1University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1865. Deformable Models (Snakes) for Fractal Analysis of Brain Tumors on T2-Weighted Images Aileen Quintana1, Demián Pereira, 12, Miguel Martín-Landrove1, 3 1Centro de Física Molecular y Médica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela; 2Departamento de Física Aplicada, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela; 3Fundación Instituto de Estudios Avanzados, IDEA, Caracas, Venezuela
1866. A Semi-Automatic Segmentation of Brain Tumor Using DTI Data Set Takao Goto1, Hiroyuki Kabasawa1, Tetsuji Tsukamoto1 1GE Yokogawa Medical Systems Ltd., Hino-shi, Tokyo, Japan
1867. Highly-Automated 3D Segmentation of Femoral Bone from Hip MRI Rupin Haily Dalvi1, Rafeef Abugharbieh1, Derek Charles Wilson2, David Robert Wilson2 1University Of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; 2University Of British Columbia and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
1868. Parsimonious Model Selection for DTI Tissue Segmentation and Classification: Study on Simulated and Experimental Data Raisa Z. Freidlin1, Evren Ozarslan1, Michal E. Komlosh1, Lin Ching Chang1, Cheng Guan Koay1, Derek K. Jones2, Peter J. Basser1 1National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; 2University of Cardiff, Cardiff, UK
1869. Statistical Shape Analysis on 3D MRI of the Ventricular System of the Cyln2/Rsn Double Knock-Out Mice Nadja Van Camp1, Toon Huysmans2, Marleen Verhoye1, Niels Galjart3, Jan Sijbers2, Annemie Van der Linden1 1University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium; 2University of Antwerp, Belgium; 3Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
1870. iDQC Anisotropy Map Imaging for Tumor Tissue Characterization In Vivo Rosa Tamara Branca1, Gigi Galiana2, Elizabeth Rose Jenista1, Carola Leuschner3, Challa S S R Kumar3, Warren S. Warren1 1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; 2Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, USA; 3Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
1871. Registration of Anatomical MRI and Histological Sections for Rat Brain Alban Caporossi1, 2, Michel Dojat1, 2, Samuel Valable1, 2, Vedat Eljezi1, 2, Christoph Segebarth1, 2, Chantal Rémy1, 2, Emmanuel L. Barbier1, 2 1Inserm, Grenoble, France; 2Université Grenoble 1, Grenoble, France
1872. Dynamic Registration of Cardiac MR Images Evelyn A. Firle1, Stefanie Nowak1, Stefan Wesarg1 1Fraunhofer IGD, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany
1873. Robust Kinetic Model Fitting for Motion Corrupted DCE-MRI Data Angela Caunce1, Giovanni A. Buonaccorsi1, Geoff J M Parker1 1University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
1874. Signal-To-Noise Analysis of T1-Based Fluid Oxygen Partial Pressure Measurements Greg Zaharchuk1, Zhen J. Wang2, Reed F. Busse3, Bonnie N. Joe2, Benjamin M. Yeh2 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA; 2UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA; 3GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
1875. Analyzing Perfusion in Human Gray Matter Wen-Chau Wu1, 2, Eric Wong2 1University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; 2University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
1876. Validation of Quantitative Contrast-Enhanced Pulmonary Perfusion MRI Using H215O-PET Daniel Neeb1, Rainer Peter Kunz1, Sebastian Ley2, Gabór Szábo3, Ludwig G. Strauss2, H-U Kauczor2, Karl-Friedrich Kreitner1, Wolgang G. Schreiber1 1Mainz University Medical School, Mainz, Germany; 2DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany; 3University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
1877. Signal-To-Noise Ratio of IDEAL-Separated Water and Fat Images from Accelerated Acquisitions Philip M. Robson1, Scott B. Reeder2, Aaron K. Grant1, Daniel K. Sodickson1, Charles A. McKenzie1 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1878. Optimization of the SNR/resolution Tradeoff for Registration in Magnetic Resonance Images Shoan Kale1, 2, Jason P. Lerch1, R. Mark Henkelman1, 2, X. Josette Chen1, 2 1Mouse Imaging Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1879. SNR Estimation in Fast Dynamic Imaging Using Bootstrapped Statistics Matthew Joseph Riffe1, Martin Blaimer2, Kestutis J. Barkauskas1, Jeffrey L. Duerk1, 2, Mark A. Griswold2 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA; 2University Hospitals of Cleveland and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1880. Estimating SNR Efficiency in Non-Cartesian Trajectories: Cartesian Is to Apples as BLADE Is to Schnitzel Kestutis Barkauskas1, Martin Blaimer1, Jeffrey Duerk1, Mark Griswold1 1Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
1881. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Diffusion Parameters with a Rician Noise Model Jesper L. R. Andersson1 1FMRIB-Centre, Oxford, UK
1882. Rician Noise Reduction in MR Images Via Non-Local Maximum Likelihood Estimation Lili He1, Ian R. Greenshields1 1University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA
1883. Suppression of Noise in Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Inverse Imaging Using Signal-Space Projection Fa-Hsuan Lin1, Matti S. Hamalainen2, Thomas Witzel2, Thomas Witzel2, Lawrence L. Wald2, John W. Belliveau2 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts
1884. Analysis of MRI Data Compression Using Principal Component Analysis Junyu Guo1, Hee Kwon Song1 1University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1885. Evaluation of Principal Component Analysis for Highly Undersampled Radial DCE-MRI Junyu Guo1, Mark A. Rosen1, Hee Kwon Song1 1University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
1886. QABox: Automatic Real-Time MR Image Quality Assurance System for Clinical Trials Gianlorenzo Fagiolo1, Joseph V. Hajnal1, Derek Hill2, Nick Fox3, Jonathan Kennedy3, Kate McLeish4, Adam Waldman5, Alex Dresner1 1Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK; 2University College London, UK; 3National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, UK; 4IXICO Ltd, UK; 5Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, UK
1887. Improved MR Image Magnification by Generalized Interpolation of Complex Data Zachary W. Slavens1, 2, Richard S. Hinks1, Jason A. Polzin1, Michael T. Johnson2 1GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA; 2Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
1888. Assessment of the Limiting Resolution in MRI Hannah Joan Coward1, 2, Ruth L. O'Gorman1, 2, Donald W. McRobbie3, 4 1King's College Hospital, London, UK; 2Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK; 3Imperial College, London, UK; 4Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK
1889. Validation of Voxel-Based Relaxometry Using Manual Region-Of-Interest Measurements Heath Richard James Pardoe1, Gaby S. Pell1, Regula S. Briellmann1, Graeme D. Jackson1 1Brain Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
1890. Physical Models of Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow in Patients with Chiari I Malformation Mohammed Farhoud1, Andrew L. Wentland1, Oliver Wieben1, Jessica L. Klaers1, Walter F. Block1, Youngkyoo Jung1, Alejandro Roldan1, Victor M. Haughton1 1University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1891. Numerical Modeling of CSF Flow in Patient - Specific Anatomical Models Alejandro Roldán1, Andrew Louis Wentland1, Oliver Wieben1, Walter F. Block1, Jessica L. Klaers1, Youngkyoo Jung1, Victor Haughton1, Tim Osswald1 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1892. Quantification of SPIO Iron: Comparison of Three Methods W. Thomas Dixon1, Amit M. Kulkarni, Dan E. Meyer, Brian C. Bales2, Thomas K. Foo 1GE Global Research, Niskayuna, New York, USA; 2GEGlobal Research,
1893. Sensitive and Automated Detection of Iron-Oxide Labeled Cells Using Phase Image Cross-Correlation Analysis Parker Henry Mills1, 2, Yi-Jen L. Wu1, 2, Chien Ho1, 2, Eric T. Ahrens1, 2 1Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Penn, USA; 2Pittsburgh NMR Center for Biomedical Research, Pittsburgh, Penn, USA
1894. CDII Performance at Low Conductivity Contrast Weijing Ma1, Tim P. DeMonte2, Dinghui Wang1, Adrian I. Nachman1, Michael LG Joy1 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Field Metrica Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1895. Metabolomic Imaging Kate W. Jordan1, Eva Ratai2, Jinhua Sheng3, Bruce G. Jenkins2, George Dai2, Leslie Ying3, Chin-Lee Wu2, Leo L. Cheng2 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 2Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; 3University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
1896. Brain Tumor Nosologic Maps Obtained from T2-Weighted Images Miguel Martín-Landrove1, 2 1Centro de Física Molecular y Médica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela; 2Fundación Instituto de Estudios Avanzados, IDEA, Caracas, Venezuela
1897. Observer Preference of Magnetic Resonance Images at Fixed Imaging Time Shoan Kale1, 2, X. Josette Chen1, 2, R. Mark Henkelman1, 2 1Mouse Imaging Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1898. Analysis of Quantitative MT Using Principal Component Analysis Mara Cercignani1, Mark Symms1, Rebecca Samson1, Mahinda Yogarajah1, Maria Ron1, Gareth Barker2 1UCL, London, England, UK; 2KCL, London, England, UK
1899. Characterization of the Motional Spectrum of Nuclear Spins by Means of Spatial Independent Component Analysis (SICA) Claus Kiefer1, Luca Remonda1, Marwan ElKoussy1, Gerhard Schroth1 1University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
1900. Texture Analysis Parameters and the Point Spread Function Daniel John Tozer1, Mark R. Symms1 1University College London, London, UK
Hall 14.1 Tuesday 13:30 - 15:30
1901. Comparison of the Uniform and Golden Angle Projection Reconstruction Schemes Using a Dynamic Sampling Simulation Rachel Wai-Chung Chan1, Donald Bruce Plewes2 1University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; 2Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
1902. Streak Artifact Suppression in Multi-Coil MRI with Radial Sampling Eugene G. Kholmovski1, Dennis L. Parker1, Edward V.R. Di Bella1 1University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
1903. Projection Reconstruction MR Imaging Using FOCUSS Sungho Tak1, Yeji Han, Hyun Wook Park, Jong Chul Ye 1Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology, Yuseong-gu, Daejon, Republic of Korea
1904. Time-Variable Filtering of Spiral Acquisitions for Outer Volume Suppression Laura Jean Pisani1, Roland Bammer1, Gary Glover1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1905. Iterative Reconstruction for SMART Imaging Sangwoo Lee1, Jeffrey A. Fessler2, Douglas C. Noll2 1GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wisconsin, USA; 2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
1906. Sub-Pixel Image Registration Using Ferrite-Containing Micro-Beads Byung Hee Han1, Hyun Chung Kim1, Tae Seok Park1, Min Hyoung Cho1, Soo Yeol Lee1 1Kyung Hee University, Yongin, Kyungki, Republic of Korea
1907. Improving Super-Resolution by Adopting Phase-Scrambling Fourier Imaging Satoshi Ito1, na Liu1, Yoshifumi Yamada1 1Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan
1908. Channel Compression and Denoising Sathya Vijayakumar1, Feng Huang1, James H. Akao2, Mark K. Limkeman1, George Randall Duensing1 1Invivo Corporation, Gainesville, Florida, USA; 2GE HealthCare, Wisconsin, USA
1909. An Iterative Off-Resonance and Signal Decay Correction for Improved R2* Mapping Tobias Knopp1, Hannes Dahnke2, Holger Eggers2, Julien Sénégas2 1University Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany; 2Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany
1910. Estimation of Compartmental Signals from Limited Fourier Samples Justin P. Haldar1, Diego Hernando1, Zhi-Pei Liang1 1University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA
1911. A Novel, Accurate Method for Computing the Density Compensation Function for Regridding Non-Cartesian K-Space Data Sandeep Jana1, Manojkumar Saranathan1 1Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
1912. Varying Kernel Extent Gridding Reconstruction Tolga Cukur1, Juan Manuel Santos1, Dwight George Nishimura1, John Mark Pauly1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1913. Block-Wise FFT: A Memory Efficient FFT Technique for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Rong Zhang1, Feng Huang2 1University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; 2Invivo Corporation, Gainesville, Florida, USA
1914. Accurate Reconstruction in PR-MRI Despite Truncated Data Joelle Karine Barral1, Hochong H. Wu1, Garry E. Gold1, Norbert J. Pelc1, John M. Pauly1, Dwight G. Nishimura1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1915. Linear Off-Resonance Correction for Partial-K-Space 3D Spiral Imaging Kristin L. Granlund1, Brain A. Hargreaves1 1Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
1916. Dual-Echo Gradient Echo (DEGE) Phase Contrast (PC) Imaging for High Temporal Resolution Flow Studies in Flow Phantom, Aneurysm Models and In Vivo Human Carotid Artery Sinyeob Ahn1, Shantanu Sinha2 1University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA; 2University of California, San Diego, California, USA
1917. Criterion to Accelerate Time-Resolved MRI Based on the Corners of a 4D K-Space Matt A. Bernstein1, Yunhong Shu1 1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
1918. HYPR Reconstruction with Automatic Detection of Contrast Arrival Andres Carrillo1, Jean H. Brittain2, Julia V. Velikina3, Yan Wu3, Frank R. Korosec3, Oliver Wieben3, Charles A. Mistretta3 1GE Healthcare, Evanston, Illinois, USA; 2GE Healthcare, Madison, Wisconsin, USA; 3University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1919. The Study of Temporal Behavior and Image Quality of HYPR Using Computer Simulations Yan Wu1, Charles A. Mistretta1, Oliver Wieben1, Frank R. Korosec1 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1920. 3D HYPR in CE MRA of the Lower Extremeties Yan Wu1, Oliver Wieben1, Charles A. Mistretta1, Frank R. Korosec1 1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
1921. Total Variation Denoised Dynamic Reconstruction Applied to Pulmonary Perfusion Imaging in the Rat Jiayu Song1, 2, Nilesh Mistry1, 2, Qing H. Liu1, G. Allan Johnson2 1Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA; 2Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
1922. Accelerated Iterative Reconstruction of Temporally Regularized Dynamic MRI Kimberly A. Khalsa1, Jeffrey A. Fessler1 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
1923. Flexible and Retrospective Trade-Off Between Temporal and Spatial Resolution in Dynamic MR Imaging Stefanie Winkelmann1, Thomas Koehler1, Tobias Schaeffter2 1Philips Research Europe, Hamburg, Germany; 2King's College London, London, UK
|