13:30 |
0597. |
Differential approach to
quantitative susceptibility mapping without background field
removal
Tian Liu1, Dong Zhou2, Pascal
Spincemaille2, and Yi Wang2
1MedImageMetric LLC, New York, New York,
United States, 2Radiology,
Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York,
United States
High quality background field removal is a critical yet
challenging step in quantitative susceptibility mapping
(QSM), as it involves phase unwrapping, skull stripping,
and knowledge of the boundary conditions. In this work,
we provide a theoretical analysis of the background
field removal and propose to bypass all the steps using
a differential equation approach.
|
13:42 |
0598. |
HARPERELA Phase Processing
for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
Wei Li1,2, Alexandru V Avram1,3,
Bing Wu1,4, Xue Xiao1,5, and
Chunlei Liu1,6
1Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke
University, Durham, NC, United States, 2Research
Imaging Institute, University of Texas Health Science
Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States, 3National
Institute of Health, Bethesda, DC, United States, 4GE
Healthcare, Beijing, China,5Tsinghua
University, Beijing, China, 6Radiology,
Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
3D phase unwrapping and background phase removal are
typically two separated preprocessing steps for
quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). We developed
a novel method for integrated phase unwrapping and
harmonic background phase removal using Laplacian, named
as HARPERELLA. HARPERELLA is fast, robust, easily to
implement and yields local tissue phase with similar
accuracy to that using the well-known SHARP and PDF
methods. To facilitate evaluation and dissemination, we
combined HARPERELLA, QSM, susceptibility tensor imaging
(STI) algorithms and related graphical user interfaces
into a software package, named as “STI Suite”, which is
available online for free academic use.
|
13:54 |
0599. |
Which parameters are
optimal? - A comprehensive numerical analysis of background
phase correction with SHARP
Ferdinand Schweser1, Pιnar Senay Özbay2,3,
Andreas Deistung1, Edsel Daniel Peres Gomez1,
Xiang Feng1, Daniel Nanz2, and
Jürgen R Reichenbach1
1Medical Physics Group, Institute of
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology I, Jena
University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University
Jena, Jena, Germany, 2Department
of Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich,
Switzerland, 3Institute
for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich,
Zurich, Switzerland
Sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction for phase data
(SHARP) is regarded as one of the most important
techniques in the area of background correction for QSM.
The influence of the SHARP parameters has not been
investigated in detail so far and they are usually
chosen empirically, which may have serious consequences
for the comparability of studies relying on SHARP
processed phase images. We performed a comprehensive
analysis of the impact of different parameter choices on
the resulting images and propose a universal definition
of the regularization parameter that does not depend on
the spherical radius or on the image resolution.
|
14:06 |
0600.
|
Background Field Removal by
Solving the Laplacian Boundary Value Problem
Dong Zhou1, Tian Liu2, Pascal
Spincemaille1, and Yi Wang1,3
1Radiology Department, Weill Cornell Medical
College, New York, NY, United States, 2Medimagemetric
LLC, NY, United States, 3Biomedical
Engineering Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY,
United States
We assume simple boundary conditions and remove the
background field by explicitly solving the boundary
value problems of Laplace’s or Poisson’s equation. The
proposed Laplacian boundary value (LBV) method for
background field removal retains data near the boundary
and is computationally efficient. Tests on a numerical
phantom, an experimental phantom and in in vivo data
sets showed that LBV was more effective than the SHARP
and PDF methods.
|
14:18 |
0601.
|
Fast Reconstruction for
Regularized Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping
Berkin Bilgic1, Audrey Fan2,
Cornelius Eichner1, Stephen Cauley1,
Jonathan Polimeni1, Marta Bianciardi1,
Elfar Adalsteinsson2, Lawrence Wald1,
and Kawin Setsompop1
1Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging,
Charlestown, MA, United States, 2MIT,
Cambridge, MA, United States
A high-resolution whole brain QSM reconstruction can
take up to 20 min on a workstation, which poses a limit
on QSM usability in clinical and research settings.
Herein, we introduce an improved Split-Bregman (SB)
L1-regularized dipole inversion algorithm that offers
20× faster reconstruction relative to the standard
nonlinear conjugate gradient (NCG) solver. Additionally,
we extend SB L1-regularization to admit
magnitude-weighting that prevents smoothing across edges
identified on the magnitude signal, and solve this more
complicated problem 5× faster than the NCG approach.
Further, we extend the previously proposed closed-form
L2-based inversion to admit magnitude-weighting, and
demonstrate 15× acceleration relative to NCG by
employing a preconditioner that leads to faster
convergence. Utility of the proposed methods is
demonstrated in high-resolution (0.6 mm isotropic) 3D
GRE data at 3T, as well as multi-echo Simultaneous
Multi-Slice (SMS) EPI time-series at 7T.
|
14:30 |
0602.
|
Modulated closed form
solution for quantitative susceptibility mapping -
permission withheld
Diana Khabipova1, Rolf Gruetter1,2,
and Marques P. José3
1LIFMET, EPFL, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 2Radiology,
University of Geneva, Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland, 3Radiology,
University Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) has shown the
potential delivering iron deposition estimations in deep
grey matter structures. Compared to multiple orientation
acquisitions, many proposed regularization methods
remain time consuming, rely on careful regularization
selection and provide inferior results. A recently
proposed closed-form solution including an
l2-regularization allows fast reconstructions. Our
methodology uses additional k-space position dependent
modulation, thus avoiding regularizing not ill-posed
regions and being effective without showing signs of
over-smoothing QSM maps. Optimal modulation enables
largely independence from regularization parameters, .
Being comparable for values
an order of magnitude greater than optimum makes it
ideal for unsupervised usage.
|
14:42 |
0603.
|
Slab Segmented
Edge-preserving QSM Method
Fei Cong1, Bo Wang1, Xiaohong Joe
Zhou2, Yan Zhuo1, and Yongquan Ye3
1Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China, 2Department
of Radiology and Center for MR Research, University of
Illinois Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United States, 3Department
of Radiology, School of Medicine, Wayne State
University, Detroit, MI, United States
A new edge-preserving method for quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) is proposed, which uses 3D
slab segmented Wiener filtered phase data as input and
the convex half-quadratic regularizing algorithm to
suppress the artifacts when solving the inverse problem
by using ill-conditioned Green¡¯s function kernel.
Compared to current QSM methods, this edge-preserved
method reserves the high spatial frequency details for
veins in the final susceptibility maps. The comparisons
between quadratic regularized and edge-preserved methods
of the whole brain are presented, and the feasibility
and future work are discussed.
|
14:54 |
0604. |
Single-Step Quantitative
Susceptibility Mapping using Total Generalized Variation and
3D EPI
Kristian Bredies1, Stefan Ropele2,
Benedikt A Poser3, Markus Barth4,
and Christian Langkammer2
1Institute of Mathematics and Scientific
Computing, University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 2Department
of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria, 3Faculty
of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University,
Maastricht, Netherlands, 4Donders
Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud
University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
Combined 3D EPI acquisition combined with single-step
TGV reconstruction yielded reliably QSM images of the
entire brain with 1mm isotropic resolution in 1 minute
acquisition time.
|
15:06 |
0605. |
The best of both worlds:
Improved rapid quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) by
combining closed-form L2 regularization with SDI
Ferdinand Schweser1, Andreas Deistung1,
Xiang Feng1, Edsel Daniel Peres Gomez2,
and Jürgen R Reichenbach1
1Medical Physics Group, Institute of
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology I, Jena
University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University
Jena, Jena, Germany, 2Medical
Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and
Interventional Radiology I, Jena University Hospital -
Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Germany
Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is a novel
post-processing technique for gradient-echo phase data.
Schweser et al. have recently presented that inverse
filtering with extreme thresholding of the unit dipole
response (SDI) yields within seconds susceptibility maps
without noise amplification and with a low level of
streaking artifacts. Bilgic et al. recently presented a
closed-form solution for rapid L2-regularized QSM with a
gradient-based penalty (CF-L2) that provides images with
even reduced noise level compared to SDI . In this
contribution, we show that combining CF-L2 with SDI can
considerably reduce reconstruction artifacts.
|
15:18 |
0606.
|
A joint background field
removal and dipole deconvolution approach for quantitative
susceptibility mapping in the liver
Samir D. Sharma1, Diego Hernando1,
Debra E. Horng1, and Scott B. Reeder1,2
1Radiology, University of Wisconsin -
Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Medical
Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison,
Wisconsin, United States
Noninvasive quantification of liver iron concentration
is important for the detection and staging of iron
overload as well as for effective longitudinal
monitoring during treatment. Magnetic susceptibility is
a fundamental property of tissue that has a well-defined
relationship to iron concentration. Quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) methods have been developed
in the brain to quantify the concentrations of localized
iron deposits. The purpose of this work was to develop a
QSM technique for the liver and to demonstrate its
feasibility for measuring susceptibility in the liver,
which may serve as an imaging biomarker of liver iron
overload.
|
|