13:30 |
0622. |
A modular 16 ch.
Transmit/32 ch. Receive Array for parallel Transmission and
High Resolution fMRI at 7 Tesla
Gregor Adriany1, Scott Schillak2,
Matt Waks2, Brandon Tramm2, Andrea
Grant1, Essa Yacoub1, Tommy
Vaughan1, Cheryl Olman1, Sebatian
Schmitter1, and Kamil Ugurbil1
1Medical School, Center for Magnetic
Resonance Research, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN, United States, 2Virtumed
LLC, MN, United States
Multi-channel transmit arrays are essential at ultra
hifh fields (UHF) to gain B1+-field control and to
support parallel transmission. We combined a dedicated
16 channel transmit array with a 32 channel receive only
array in a tightfitting modular coil housing. Results
demonstrated excellent coil separation , whole brain
coverage and SNR. The achievable homogeneity is
significantly improved compared to a 1TX32RX whole brain
coil (Nova Medical, Wilmington,MA,USA). The major
advantage of the presented coil is increased pTX
capability due to a dual row Tx design and significantly
improved task presentation.
|
13:42 |
0623. |
An parallel-transmit,
parallel-receive coil for routine scanning on a 7T head-only
scanner
Kyle M Gilbert1, Joseph S Gati1,
Esther Kho1,2, L Martyn Klassen1,
Peter Zeman1, and Ravi S Menon1
1The University of Western Ontario, London,
Ontario, Canada, 2University
of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
An 8-channel transmit coil and 32-channel receive coil
were developed for use in a 7T head-only scanner. The
limited radial space allotted for an RF coil in a
head-only scanner presents design challenges that can
affect coil performance. Further complexity arises when
designing the coil to be practical for patient studies
and routine scanning. These challenges and their
solutions are discussed in this study, along with an
evaluation of the coil performance.
|
13:54 |
0624. |
8-channel double tuned 13C-1H
transceiver phased array for 13C
MRS in human brain at 7T
Guillaume Donati1, Ozlem Ipek2,
Eulalia Serés Roig1, and Rolf Gruetter1,3
1Laboratory of Functional and Metabolic
Imaging, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,
Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 2Centre
d'Imagerie Biomédicale, École Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne, Lausanne, Vaud, Switzerland, 3Department
of Radiology, Universities of Lausanne and Geneva,
Lausanne, Geneva, Switzerland
The main drawback of 13C-MRS
is the low sensitivity, which makes 13C
detection difficult. In addition, the 13C-1H
hetero-nuclear J coupling necessitates double-tuned 13C-1H
coils for proton decoupling during 13C
signal acquisition. Array coils provide a high
sensitivity over a large field-of-view. In this study, a
four channel 13C-four
channel 1H
transceiver array coil for direct 13C-MRS
in human brain at 7T was built. EM simulations show a
fourfold improvement of B1+/√SAR10g,max compared
to a linear 13C-quadrature 1H
coil. 1H-decoupled 13C
MRS spectra were acquired in vitro, demonstrating the
feasibility of an eight channel double-tuned transceiver 13C-1H
array at 7T.
|
14:06 |
0625.
|
A 10-channel TMS-compatible
planar RF coil array for human brain MRI at 3T
Pu-Yeh Wu1, Ying-Hua Chu1, Aapo
Nummenmaa2, Thomas Witzel2,
Shang-Yueh Tsai3, Wen-Jui Kuo4,
and Fa-Hsuan Lin1,2
1Institute of Biomedical Engineering,
National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Athinoula
A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts
General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 3Institute
of Applied Physics, National Chengchi University,
Taipei, Taiwan, 4Institute
of Neuroscience, National Yang Ming University, Taipei,
Taiwan
A slim TMS-compatible MRI 10-channel RF coil array was
developed. The coil array was 2 mm thick to maximize TMS
efficacy and positioning freedom. Empirical data show
that the average SNR of TMS-compatible coil array is 44%
better than the commercial 32-channel array within the 5
cm depth. This TMS-compatible RF coil array is expected
to offer both anatomical images and functional MRI
signal induced by TMS with high sensitivity.
|
14:18 |
0626. |
7T 22ch Wrap-around Coil
Array for Cervical Spinal Cord Imaging
Bei Zhang1, Priti Balchandani1,
Zahi A. Fayad1, Joo-won Kim1,
Christopher Cannistraci1, Bernd Stoeckel2,
and Junqian Xu1
1Translational and Molecular Imaging
Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New
York, New York, United States, 2Siemens
Medical Solution, New York, New York, United States
A 22 channel wrap-around coil array was built for 7T
cervical spinal cord imaging. The coil consists of four
transmit-receive (Tx/Rx) elements and eighteen
receive-only (Rx) elements. Two of the four Tx/Rx
elements are anterior and the other two are posterior to
the subject. The eighteen Rx elements, of which six are
anterior and twelve are posterior to the subject,
surround the Tx/Rx elements. All the coils follow the
contour of the body to maximize SNR. Both simulation and
experiments show high transmit efficiency with the
wrap-around design and excellent SNR for high-resolution
cervical spinal cord imaging at 7T.
|
14:30 |
0627. |
A 7 T Spine Array Combining
Dipole Transmitters and Loop Receivers
Qi Duan1, Govind Nair2, Natalia
Gudino1, Jacco A. de Zwart1, Peter
van Gelderen1, Joseph Murphy-Boesch1,
Daniel S. Reich2, Jeff H. Duyn1,
and Hellmut Merkle1
1Laboratory of Functional and Molecular
Imaging, NINDS, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
MD, United States, 2Division
of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, NINDS, National
Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
To date, loop-based arrays are still the prevailing
design for 7 T spine imaging. In this work, a prototype
that combines loops for signal reception with electric
dipole antennae for transmit is presented. It aims to
circumvent the dilemma for optimizing loop arrays at 7 T
caused by the conflicting extended field-of-view and
short wavelength. In comparison with a previous
loop-based design, the new array has simpler cabling and
higher transmit efficiency, even after correcting for
slightly elevated SAR deposition. The reduced power need
could be exploited to increase resolution or acquisition
speed more than twofold.
|
14:42 |
0628. |
A Four Channel Transmit
Receive "Loopole" Array for Spine Imaging at 7.0 Tesla
Karthik Lakshmanan1,2, Martijn Cloos1,2,
Ryan Brown1,2, Timothy Shepherd3,4,
and Graham C Wiggins1,2
1The Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for
Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York
University School of Medicine, Newyork, NY, United
States, 2The
Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research
(CAI2R),Department of Radiology, New York University
School of Medicine, Newyork, NY, United States, 3Radiology,
NYU Langone Medical Center, NY, United States, 4The
Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research
(CAI2R),Department of Radiology, New York University
School of Medicine, NY, United States
A loop coil with a highly non-uniform current
distribution can capture loop like and dipole like
fields. This loopole element provides the opportunity
to tailor both the orientation and the intensity of its
asymmetric current to achieve improved B1+ efficiency or
SNR. In this work the feasibility of using loopole
elements as building blocks to create transceiver arrays
is explored. A novel split four-element loopole array
with two anterior and two posterior elements was modeled
and constructed. The array was used to image the human
spine at 7.0T. The loopole array exhibited substantial
performance improvements over published spine array
designs.
|
14:54 |
0629. |
Z-direction B1+ Homogenization
Using B1-control Receive Array Coil and B1 Rectifying
Fin for L-spine Imaging at 3T
Yukio Kaneko1, Yoshihisa Soutome1,2,
Hideta Habara1,2, Yoshitaka Bito2,
and Hisaaki Ochi1
1Central Research Laboratory, Hitachi Ltd.,
Kokubunji, Tokyo, Japan, 2Hitachi
Medical Corporation, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
The B1 inhomogeneity in a human body increases as the
strength of a static magnetic field increases. Various
methods to reduce the B1 inhomogeneity have been
developed. However, B1 inhomogeneity in the z-direction
still remains in lumbar spine (L-spine) imaging. Our
previous study showed that a gB1-control receive array
coil (BRAC)h and gB1 rectifying fin (BRF)h can
control the B1 field locally. In this study, BRAC and
BRF were designed in an FDTD simulation, and the B1
field and local SAR in a human model were calculated.
BRAC and BRF were confirmed to reduce B1 inhomogeneity
in the L-spine imaging.
|
15:06 |
0630. |
An integrated 8-channel
Tx/Rx body coil for 7 Tesla whole-body MRI
Stephan Orzada1, Andreas K. Bitz2,
Marcel Gratz1,3, Sören Johst1,
Maximilian N. Völker1, Oliver Kraff1,
Dominik Beyer1, Tristan Mathiebe1,
Ashraf Abuelhaija4, Klaus Solbach4,
and Mark E. Ladd2
1Erwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, Essen, NRW,
Germany, 2Medical
Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center
(DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,3High-field and
Hybrid MR Imaging, University Clinic Essen, Essen,
Germany, 4RF
Technology, University Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
In this work we present an 8-channel Tx/Rx array for 7
Tesla whole-body imaging which is situated between the
inner bore liner and the gradient coil similar to the
body coils in standard low-field systems. The array is
compared to a close-fitting array of similar elements,
and first images of a human volunteer are presented.
While transmit efficiency and SNR are reduced in
comparison to a close-fitting array, a larger
field-of-view in the z-direction is achieved.
|
15:18 |
0631. |
Combined 8-channel
transceiver fractionated dipole antenna array with a
16-channel loop coil receive array for body imaging at 7
Tesla
Ingmar J. Voogt1, Dennis W.J. Klomp1,
Hans Hoogduin1, Mariska P. Luttje1,
Peter R. Luijten1, Cornelis A.T. van den Berg1,
and Alexander J.E. Raaijmakers1
1Imaging Division, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht,
Utrecht, Netherlands
We developed an 8-element transceiver fractionated
dipole array, combined with a detunable 16-element
receive-only loop coil array and evaluated it by
prostate imaging on six volunteers (BMI 22-32.8).
Reflection and coupling levels are low for all
investigated subjects. B1+ amplitude in the prostate
(after B1 shimming) ranges from 10 ěT (BMI 32.8) to 15.4
ěT (BMI 22). T2w prostate images are of good quality.
The SNR of this design is better than for a design with
antennas only (27 vs. 22). The good imaging performance
with extended acceleration potential make this array an
attractive design for body imaging applications.
|
|